Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14132 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67057 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Dec 2004 01:20:51 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67030 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2004 01:20:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.omniti.com) (66.80.117.3) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 2004 01:20:51 -0000 DomainKey-Status: good DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=test; d=omniti.com; h=Received:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=O+gxpwXp8MzHjNfd5Jnx1KUclVydZFlwY+qhMdtWJRkrW10nsco0xzYaKEnJ8wYq K/hLBRpc4BTggtbfY/IM0TtbUhDGn2/dPJaViKRTPQcj3iRMvAaaETWNX3cfSvtG Received: from ([205.157.244.33:12872] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by mail.omniti.com (ecelerity HEAD) with SMTP id 18/F5-26596-96A77C14 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:20:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41C776C4.70307@cschneid.com> References: <000601c4e6d2$6bda0f30$0100a8c0@pc07653> <41C74D41.7060608@lerdorf.com> <20041220222248.49013.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <41C776C4.70307@cschneid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-ID: <542F5DC0-52EE-11D9-B9E1-000D93359332@omniti.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: George Schlossnagle , Derick Rethans , Lester Caine , internals@lists.php.net Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:19:15 -0500 To: Christian Schneider X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Re:_[PHP-DEV]_Why_we_don=92t_like_PHP_/_?= From: george@omniti.com (George Schlossnagle) On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:05 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: >> Why would we (as PHP developers) invest time in something while the >> current version provides us with all we need? > > Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different > reasons? > > According to your argument PHP would only need to support one single > OS and Webserver because "it provides all we need". > > At some point you'll have to face it: Apache 2 is becoming a popular > "platform". It's obviously up to you at what point you'll consider > this important enough to spend time on it but a reality check every so > often is never a bad thing. Not to sound overly American, but isn't this the sort of thing that's just worked out by market forces? When enough people want the apache2 sapi to be production quality, then eventually someone will become interested enough to do the work. George