Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14131 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 576 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Dec 2004 01:05:16 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 506 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2004 01:05:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xaxa.search.ch) (195.141.85.117) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 2004 01:05:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xaxa.search.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62F6D8D3; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:05:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by xaxa.search.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 5D2506D8D6; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:05:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.42] (ultrafilter2-i [192.168.85.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by xaxa.search.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060266D8D3; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:05:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41C776C4.70307@cschneid.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:05:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040906 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, de-ch, de, fr-ch MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans Cc: Lester Caine , internals@lists.php.net References: <000601c4e6d2$6bda0f30$0100a8c0@pc07653> <41C74D41.7060608@lerdorf.com> <20041220222248.49013.qmail@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on xaxa.search.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we =?windows-1252?Q?don=92t_like_PHP_/_?= From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Derick Rethans wrote: > Why would we (as PHP developers) invest time in something while the > current version provides us with all we need? Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different reasons? According to your argument PHP would only need to support one single OS and Webserver because "it provides all we need". At some point you'll have to face it: Apache 2 is becoming a popular "platform". It's obviously up to you at what point you'll consider this important enough to spend time on it but a reality check every so often is never a bad thing. - Chris