Newsgroups: php.doc,php.internals,php.pecl.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.doc:969365351 php.internals:13999 php.pecl.dev:1691 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34051 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Dec 2004 18:30:23 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7021 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 18:24:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prohost.org) (216.126.86.27) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2004 18:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 23274 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 18:24:49 -0000 Received: from cpe0050bad46dce-cm000f9f7d6664.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (@69.196.31.138) by prohost.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2004 18:24:49 -0000 Message-ID: <41B0AF72.8000207@prohost.org> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:24:50 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (Windows/20041201) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: Christian Stocker , internals@lists.php.net, pecl-dev@lists.php.net, phpdoc@lists.php.net References: <5.1.0.14.2.20041201080848.02dc9c60@localhost> <41AE489C.2070800@caedmon.net> <41AE6D50.7030200@gmx.net> <73562213.20041202081732@marcus-boerger.de> <41AF5562.3060406@gmx.net> <41AF5E57.4050106@php.net> <177411596.20041203010846@marcus-boerger.de> <41B013C1.9040209@php.net> <12110092385.20041203192322@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <12110092385.20041203192322@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] SimpleXML marked as EXPERIMENTAL From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) I have no objection to removing the Experimental tag from the extension, in fact I welcome this change. Ilia Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Christian, > > Friday, December 3, 2004, 8:20:33 AM, you wrote: > > >>Ok. There was no real argument against not removing the EXPERIMENTAL tag >>and IMHO it isn't experimental anyway since 4.3.0, when the last big >>changes happened. Therefore I'll remove it, if noone speaks up. > > >>The other question is, should this be done already for 4.3.10 or just >>afterwards? > > > I think yes but ask Ilia :-) >