Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:13526 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10094 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Oct 2004 15:31:22 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10065 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 15:31:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 15:31:21 -0000 Received: from web1.messagingengine.com (web1.internal [10.202.2.210]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B58C34658; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:31:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by web1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 7B47027FB; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:31:21 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.001; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) Cc: "Wez Furlong" , internals@lists.php.net, helly@php.net, edink@php.net References: <1098796701.32385.207284415@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4e89b42604102607014c368073@mail.gmail.com> <1098801076.10214.207288490@webmail.messagingengine.com> <417E6C13.6070608@caraveo.com> In-Reply-To: <417E6C13.6070608@caraveo.com> To: "Shane Caraveo" Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:31:21 -0700 X-Sasl-Enc: DMSqO+nkiV+mIBK9HG4Chg 1098804681 Message-ID: <1098804681.17355.207295784@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Can someone allocate 2 command line switches for php cli on NetWare? From: kameshj@fastmail.fm ("Kamesh Jayachandran") Shane, This solution seems interesting. I will give a try. With regards Kamesh Jayachandran On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:24:03 -0700, "Shane Caraveo" said: > Here is my suggestion, > Rather than taking two switches, php should grow a generic switch for > this kind of use: > > php -o param:value;param:value; > > This allows custom mods to php a way to introduce new options that are > not part of the general php distribution, without the need to land grab > the limited switches. There is also the potential for someone to > develop an extension to allow a php script to handle some alternative > switches. > > Regards, > Shane > > Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: > > Still we need to have switches to have this interactivity or not(Based > > on usage regular/cron) > > We need one more switch to determine whether to have output in the > > Logger screen(System wide log console) or Interpreter screen.