Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:13468 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79781 invoked by uid 1010); 22 Oct 2004 15:19:30 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79755 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2004 15:19:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2004 15:19:30 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9MFJOOT018904 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:19:24 -0400 Received: from radish.cambridge.redhat.com (radish.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.90]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9MFJOr20196 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:19:24 -0400 Received: from radish.cambridge.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by radish.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i9MFJNBs010917 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:19:23 +0100 Received: (from jorton@localhost) by radish.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i9MFJNO9010916 for internals@lists.php.net; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:19:23 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:19:23 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20041022151923.GB10674@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: internals@lists.php.net References: <41EE526EC2D3C74286415780D3BA9F870527C4A2@ehost011-1.exch011.intermedia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ./configure, PHP, SuSE and the AMD64 From: jorton@redhat.com (Joe Orton) On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:36:00PM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: > AFAIK Joe is going to commit his patch, but we need to "fix" it for the > PECL extensions too if applicable. I was kind of waiting for Sascha to review it... do you want me to commit it now? PECL extensions (or any autoconf code in general) are not necessarily broken on bi-arch platforms, it's only if they use a certain style of configure check which is prevalant in ext/*/config*.m4. Regards, joe