Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:13305 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25595 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Oct 2004 00:44:06 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25469 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 00:44:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zend.com) (80.74.107.235) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 00:44:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 28570 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 00:44:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO AndiNotebook.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 00:44:02 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20041012174246.02c18da0@localhost> X-Sender: andi@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:43:58 -0700 To: "Robert Silva" , In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Updating Bug Status From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) References: At 05:23 PM 10/12/2004 -0700, Robert Silva wrote: >Going through the PHP 5 Bug Summary Report looking for stuff I may be able >to help out with and finding a lot of them that are fixed in current cvs but >are still marked as open. I'm curious when you determine a bug to be fixed >and mark it as such. I imagine a few of these are only fixed in 5.1 cvs tree >(which is what I'm testing against), do you wait for 5.1 release to mark >them as fixed? > >I've been commenting them as fixed in 5.1 CVS (hope you don't mind) when I >run across them and verify expected functionality. We usually mark it as Fixed in CVS. I guess it's not obvious which CVS (4.3.x, 5.0.x, 5.1.x) so you might want to add that with a text comment. Andi