Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:13294 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41515 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Oct 2004 22:08:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41487 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2004 22:08:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.201) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2004 22:08:03 -0000 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v30so145345rnb for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.179.17 with SMTP id b17mr1804553rnf; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.10 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <90e24d4e04101215083160a711@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:08:03 -0500 Reply-To: Jeremy Johnstone To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <152201c4b099$c07c1a20$0200a8c0@rusko> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <90e24d4e041012125377f90111@mail.gmail.com> <152201c4b099$c07c1a20$0200a8c0@rusko> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Compiling extensions From: phpdev@gmail.com (Jeremy Johnstone) I have proposed it to PECL a while back (like June I think), not sure on the status of the proposal though. Because of the nature of why I am using this extension, I need to precompile it for as many platforms as possible and use it as a dynamically loaded module (it's basically a script licensing system). I know this isn't the most idea solution, but for my needs it is basically the only one available which works the way I want. -Jeremy http://www.jeremyjohnstone.com P.S. - (off-topic reply) You must know me then I guess. I have everything but OSX available in my server rack in my house, so yes I could do it that way. Was just hoping for an easier solution. Guess I might just have to cave in and buy me an Apple if there is no other way. On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:26:25 -0400, Paul G wrote: > well, normally this would be done with autoconf (if you have code that isn't > directly portable), assuming you are distributing it as source. however, to > test you would need access to said platforms. > > have you proposed your extension to pecl? pecl-l would probably be a better > place to ask and i would think folks there would be glad to help with > testing on the platforms you don't have available. > > off-topic: you mean you don't have all those in that rack of yours? > > paul > >