Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:13151 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42123 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Oct 2004 19:05:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42097 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2004 19:05:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prohost.org) (216.126.86.27) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2004 19:05:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13598 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2004 19:04:58 -0000 Received: from cpe0050bad46dce-cm000f9f7d6664.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (@69.196.31.138) by prohost.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2004 19:04:58 -0000 Message-ID: <41619EE0.70307@prohost.org> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:05:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Bergmann , internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GCC/CFLAGS Benchmark for HEAD and PHP_5_0 From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) Very interesting numbers, I'd like to second Marcus' request for a 4.3 benchmark. I was somewhat surprised by O2 and O1 being slower then Os, while O3 in some cases may end over optimizing which would it explain it's poor showing. However, it could be that it makes simple situations slower, while more complex operations that are generally more CPU intensive will in fact become faster. If you don't mind, could you please all include data for "time make test" as it seems to cover a much greater quantity of code. Ilia