Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130736
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALrFCSwr=aK649H2Om2=Vcrfz642JsiNBfCgDVY8U1Z27KDcNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6s+ob5=eeNj7CU+kacUg6xXQaabZCN6v_j6spz69A5tTwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BC48A843-CED3-4EAA-B63B-C40EF91DF695@pmjones.io> <5c3b861a-f3ce-476a-8a24-d059069506d8@gmail.com>
 <73A3BB52-4642-439D-98BD-051416D405CA@pmjones.io>
In-Reply-To: <73A3BB52-4642-439D-98BD-051416D405CA@pmjones.io>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 11:05:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPKYkKw=xRb9QYSth-thkojzfy=2zyk_UQV8aYMhvuHfDWAo+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Remove the links to X.com from PHP.net
To: "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones@pmjones.io>
Cc: Alex Pierstoval Rock <pierstoval@gmail.com>, jimw@php.net, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045e83a0650c2e9ed"
From: chasepeeler@gmail.com (Chase Peeler)

--00000000000045e83a0650c2e9ed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 8:45=E2=80=AFAM Paul M. Jones <pmjones@pmjones.io> w=
rote:

> Hi all,
>
> > On May 1, 2026, at 05:27, Alex Pierstoval Rock <pierstoval@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jim & all,
> >>
> >> Currently, the RFC states:
> >>
> >>> due to to the current nature of the site, there is no reason for the
> project to have a presence there
> >>
> >> This is unclear -- what exactly about "the current nature of the site"
> leads to there being "no reason for the project to have a presence there"=
 ?
> Can you articulate the specifics, for the record, in the PR?
> >>
> >> -- pmj
> >
> > Do you really need more details about why X/Twitter is a problem per se=
?
> This subject has already been covered in several threads: its owner is a
> fascist that promotes and enhances fascism with the help of his networks,
> he deliberately updated the recommendation algorithm to create a
> personality-cult for his fame, the AI that's bound to this network is
> p*do-promoting, most of the people that are still there are either
> fascism-enthusiasts or compliant with what the platform has become
> (therefore, okay with the statu quo, which means "collaborating with the
> in-place system").
>
> Great -- if those are the beliefs of the RFC author, they should go
> directly in the RFC as supporting language for the reasoning behind the R=
FC.
>
> Then there's a record of exactly who is voting in agreement with those
> statements, and who is not.
>
> If there is some worry or concern about adding the reasons, that itself
> will be quite telling.
>
>
> -- pmj
>

I agree with Paul.

--=20
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com
https://linktr.ee/chasepeeler

--00000000000045e83a0650c2e9ed
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote g=
mail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, May 1, =
2026 at 8:45=E2=80=AFAM Paul M. Jones &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pmjones@pmjones=
.io">pmjones@pmjones.io</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_=
quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,=
204);padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
&gt; On May 1, 2026, at 05:27, Alex Pierstoval Rock &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:p=
ierstoval@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pierstoval@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<=
br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; Hi Jim &amp; all,<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; Currently, the RFC states:<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; due to to the current nature of the site, there is no reason f=
or the project to have a presence there<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; This is unclear -- what exactly about &quot;the current nature of =
the site&quot; leads to there being &quot;no reason for the project to have=
 a presence there&quot; ? Can you articulate the specifics, for the record,=
 in the PR?<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; -- pmj<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Do you really need more details about why X/Twitter is a problem per s=
e? This subject has already been covered in several threads: its owner is a=
 fascist that promotes and enhances fascism with the help of his networks, =
he deliberately updated the recommendation algorithm to create a personalit=
y-cult for his fame, the AI that&#39;s bound to this network is p*do-promot=
ing, most of the people that are still there are either fascism-enthusiasts=
 or compliant with what the platform has become (therefore, okay with the s=
tatu quo, which means &quot;collaborating with the in-place system&quot;).<=
br>
<br>
Great -- if those are the beliefs of the RFC author, they should go directl=
y in the RFC as supporting language for the reasoning behind the RFC.<br>
<br>
Then there&#39;s a record of exactly who is voting in agreement with those =
statements, and who is not.<br>
<br>
If there is some worry or concern about adding the reasons, that itself wil=
l be quite telling.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- pmj<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br clear=3D"all"></div><div>I agree with Paul.=C2=
=A0</div><div><br></div><span class=3D"gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><b=
r><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">Chase Peeler<=
br><a href=3D"mailto:chasepeeler@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">chasepeeler@g=
mail.com</a><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34)"><a href=3D"https://lin=
ktr.ee/chasepeeler" target=3D"_blank">https://linktr.ee/chasepeeler</a></sp=
an></div></div></div></div>

--00000000000045e83a0650c2e9ed--