Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130583
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Message-ID: <1775525507497.3152151059.3385501371@yahoo.de>
To: barel.barelon@gmail.com, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] array_get and array_has functions
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:57:24 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CABVsipiyd81s1Do_HEJKR4fsU+BXAjnH2qickjX8o0-=exH0ag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABVsipiyd81s1Do_HEJKR4fsU+BXAjnH2qickjX8o0-=exH0ag@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Vivaldi Mail/7.9.3970.47
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: hanskrentel@yahoo.de (Hans Krentel)





On Monday 06 April 2026 18:21:20 (+02:00), Barel wrote:

 > Larry,
 > [...]
 > You raise some interesting points in your message. I would like to hear
 > what other people think about them

For leaving the default value out so that the splat (or was it spread?) 
operator can be used also in favour.

About JSON Pointer I already wrote, IMHO it should be referenced in the RFC 
prominently, e.g. above the Laravel or other existing implementation 
references as it is an actual standard.

-- hakre