Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130539 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1FA1A00BC for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 20:07:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1775160433; bh=UgPvtAiSzb7M3D2++HLbL7UuaZ16fq9eyWTD3a4FC1M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fHfd8JLyewt4hHJXS+EOcN1LKlDg1h1TnmqfLmmc3sooQ/7HZdXfgHhyuKblBAvkL gbhKMDrOdaoJbrmSy3KvSCvve6YF+kgwFHug6tN+i8sjBDMWZzfZic/hBjiNDNNIs2 OKB0nwNgwj6TM7Vo815ByyX3/ES5VB1mDuR9ue0MljuGUoKxGyiw28jy3zXLXtgUlA g78oOEpP19zGO9Y8EKGiMpBdQodz5/d3tnWHm1kUghlCXNYWfIU89qsCcMgJ6PG82X DJnN+NHSlwLjFmFhexH/22VWj/BHJJFBB4PfDf7LKF0lvX4aAuSsNNzt4KbqBnnLwa YgUqQLw6q8ZEw== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47BF180040 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 20:07:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 20:06:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be; s=mail20171119; t=1775160411; bh=hSNXMGk/d0NNH/PHfldJ5B/ePtBrM+XlEbKtr/dwG10=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; b=mIo3lqT5ZoW1dqWB7FI4ohlAzc4l70HXT8taGWAjhvf0wToyVSIAsXHBQCtfEi0xV 1AJuAfTx/fjtugmFS9ympQf9fQCu8yAoD0EXViG9t/GPLbkE32bQ63nhNb/a9WzMdl UYvufSASyPM1m+Dx8AXXLKiDWxi0XrVARysyvHp8hXMibwOCqLXoFtkOPljiXpmi+G u07Pi6rc24PR2GLxK41pEdr/AOPly9vTPRN8BPAG4qgeXVanJl2tzjeO1lMWlMlogx hLmJF3zHHzVaYXRn6o9csN2dc6sr1E8PAuFgqEeYUxVtxi2PmzxFCPCP4DXXWvFwDD Et2w7E1WXHI6Q== Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:06:51 +0200 To: Calvin Buckley Cc: Derick Rethans , PHP internals Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Display Function Arguments in Errors In-Reply-To: <555659A5-34EC-4E0F-8C63-F9D22DB09385@cmpct.info> References: <939CFA28-A6FF-433F-85A0-B83345CEF4A6@cmpct.info> <26265d7b-6306-72f2-1a0f-a447576018e5@php.net> <555659A5-34EC-4E0F-8C63-F9D22DB09385@cmpct.info> Message-ID: <66e957fbc96ac928153fd6171b304373@bastelstu.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=) Hi Am 2026-03-31 15:57, schrieb Calvin Buckley: > Tim, would this name be OK? I also have a preference towards a > non-inverted name (it was more overhead to keep track of it), but I do > see wanting it consistent. I *prefer* consistency for discoverability, but I agree that “inverted” INIs are confusing. No strong opinion either way and definitely not a deal breaker for me. Best regards Tim Düsterhus