Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130409 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15DCF1A00BC for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:10:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1774116662; bh=7gw6sjP+z2usxyUDwDwOm2UN6BgoWBRKul5OJHaNP6E=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=gUURjAELRoebl3owF5UjW1VsUSpcGnr95DBo5gZlmZE7ZsdMk4XWf83rRSOOlueNq 5vZRpQpHcpUh4c5lcHeq8lvCi5HLPbdlBbIDbgSlwv6d65IqkTsFFQlPOjiqRDBvUO VUfux2FthxOWeRJBo/TcqJkGw6gBsd5bL7RbGDkbQk+MSW85NbIAhKCqvzIwvHVsxv gt/hDNIynlqTtco1JeLHl5BWapnkEGo+DtRWJ5LiVpoVa3PlbEnJVp54BNZyW+rfm+ yVfBiXb5VdCJ/Tj5EBjP5iePTuKf8uJJn0Nl03NOwapp5AgGSPHi3YO8Oung96YytT CacNfW2EIr1uw== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF0A180059 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:10:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail.gna.ch (darkcity.gna.ch [84.234.28.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC07F23800FF for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 19:10:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cschneid.com; s=default; t=1774116651; bh=7gw6sjP+z2usxyUDwDwOm2UN6BgoWBRKul5OJHaNP6E=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=OCqvubiZv6WoKkjxnMeDuzlxvXiX7TWKMWV8cU5u4cm7sWdBbGbXVzzpwoEAtgTxK mlrSm0LITD/SoveZDgLJnK4h2n1Llg5GvkJNfQFRTv5ik+JILR3HmL8p2wQbSJdtfA a1XQcPLOfvJCNfLY3+tEb0pPZmnoEjuNq3EdHNNk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at gna.ch Received: from mail.gna.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.gna.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id dG7I2rCroyd2 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 19:10:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:1210:2e2d:4d00:d1bf:4496:25d9:16fe]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46B1723800EE for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 19:10:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cschneid.com; s=default; t=1774116650; bh=7gw6sjP+z2usxyUDwDwOm2UN6BgoWBRKul5OJHaNP6E=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=KU7fPghx/8etsCXdG5PJwEGWeLmWsIudfvUMhWTBCLsaVTfYteLB7nx3ZRJru8dwl tmtlhsRK2/Y0pUoCb0xdD/kIDZKIIKfxwvaQ/lWHlT6OvspfdoEXBhW5lujCEjKCMs z9XH7l/Ym5xpFTwoJMp/Q+Nj6ujqfXhT1VZV0Hww= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.400.21\)) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Exempt input type and value validation from BC Break policy Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 19:10:49 +0100 References: To: PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.400.21) From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Am 21.03.2026 um 12:22 schrieb Gina P. Banyard : > With a small delay due to unexpected circumstances I've started the = vote on the "Exempt input type and value validation from BC Break = policy" policy RFC. > It will run from today the 2026-03-21 until the 2026-04-04 at 12:00 = UTC. >=20 > The RFC can be found at the following link: = https://wiki.php.net/rfc/policy-exempt-type-value-error-bc-policy I think adding more input parameter validation is a good thing and I = like the idea of making it easier, i.e. not requiring an RFC but not = going through a E_DEPRECATION/E_WARNING phase unfortunately is a blocker = for me and that's why I voted "no". Regards, - Chris