Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130291 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6961A00BC for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:27:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1773246455; bh=fhWHckZBnR8tFCNOa0bL+kczv+Hsr1SrX3AQeLNsyH8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aqDKfy2BfpY0dFYTTr8cOAGXV9JPC55NdpaeguxNFc03D+7SjbuedPaDrLxL9e07P lWGxtfO5ndXfE125170FKPGb53eqr8coevO9s8n1UOdXC58pU2/hHulXTfXtt310Ep zH//ofRItDOdBdRRaxbOtJwCxMIYjT4JqViWkO581gaiKBRsFjCChy08zWPAs8TDp6 YocBHK/9Eu12wSK4IrOg+jbKIghvp4ZGcBjGJW3STLsL6gB/Qztklqe6RPRdkDxiS/ +ugBuUPePQwc2KKUwMSJ5+esKtLDRs/W3EtePrSuRAbTAWYq0B7gO2aldrp9bbtxMz Ei/5zNHn63CBA== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3075180048 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:27:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-244117.protonmail.ch (mail-244117.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:27:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gpb.moe; s=protonmail2; t=1773246436; x=1773505636; bh=fhWHckZBnR8tFCNOa0bL+kczv+Hsr1SrX3AQeLNsyH8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=S6S4E0rDRBiEWRx+BPirV8jY7rT3+Huhb9njkcWIassF4Kcf6YavIXQuzdrCFSqiG lVBcC6KP9gDayGkkm9Fw7shVj8m14d4AV3dECgOPs3Dk++7ev+H12MadRbATS2EpBW SfShVyx0bdJfR9J+p/P2b1gtOfQ//Z8yLmLb6nkv0K4IvXYlbGLwMYiNMQTK/zIen2 PVSmc6Fqz4Keh1Kq7pNhnG60WezwSG1DWx+vaOHaqwKsVeKXglXxxnbGiTurAjRErB yJSbXf8ej2QA2lBGxa+F8Hfq/xFQqJEFJxjQUmYbLTfyrU+TjA9i+kbHRA/4gGcabl fh51KAhYwDPIQ== Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:27:11 +0000 To: Calvin Buckley Cc: PHP internals Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Display Function Arguments in Errors Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <939CFA28-A6FF-433F-85A0-B83345CEF4A6@cmpct.info> References: <939CFA28-A6FF-433F-85A0-B83345CEF4A6@cmpct.info> Feedback-ID: 96993444:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 9f9bca8bb28566bf78dc416e8d9eba7344d738da Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internals@gpb.moe ("Gina P. Banyard") On Wednesday, 11 March 2026 at 15:58, Calvin Buckley wr= ote: > Hi internals, >=20 > Based on the feedback I had from my proposal for function arguments in > errors last week, I'd like to introduce an RFC for it. Please let me > know what you think and please raise any possible issues. >=20 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/display_error_function_args >=20 > Regards, > Calvin I'm looking forward to this RFC, as normalizing the behaviour of diagnostic= s by removing the various docref functions is something I proposed back in = 2019. [1] And I do think that we should remove the parameter versions of the docref f= unctions as the behaviour of them if this is accepted seems hard to determi= ne. Best regards, Gina P. Banyard [1] https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/4254