Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130139
X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5])
	by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506A91A00BC
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail;
	t=1771869153; bh=K24pC7zNjvQWodCVmZVZOX2IuA0rANWH2Y0JOFRG5KA=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=Kwk0t0ZgH67MGaJcf7G2Tq5h78zzAGSFra4p56PYUHqplBvkD1a2TeHhB2XMsmuX+
	 KrIpu2n2uVrpyQAeeATO339/qI3P0Xhr5KUtClYlOwoGCPz/0++/CBCBD1FDyhmrTU
	 hLsY4qjZOoKzlv/DYTPd1nAFclCmWmK+XlC6JDAThcD5S6gIVNiqxGIyys0pHpY8tK
	 /10jgkAez6pXB/4SXF2gw1I4ERCF2DprHbuWzsq99nOUl1Ks4uMA8pRdxgiFp7++n8
	 LAuruYHYc/w7sFN+d2KegLOBkVISWv4XQwTBeQ0FGu4WDKAcDw1JNymPYfoNrjafbt
	 CdG0hhnMvWrug==
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3B0180537
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <tim@bastelstu.be>
Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be;
	s=mail20171119; t=1771869146;
	bh=K24pC7zNjvQWodCVmZVZOX2IuA0rANWH2Y0JOFRG5KA=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type:from:to:cc:subject:message-id;
	b=f0JPzA13UAqSxLmtShSXGn42e9ev91klS6pL68WBj2s2412X0O9KJWdqVVKUpqBJV
	 xb+Sbf43d7BKBk8NsSLYCVOM1znCCV+h1r7aUiK1k3RcLUW9cUyNGDumpxpQSoZLIi
	 yZgqBimriaawWKMhKGHnXv9n69SLR2BhZBQyKzRAAblhuRFqDzqi79PY5WaLD69F4h
	 g+EfH2XAmA1QkVD19Tx8olWxelIi39+Gvzyf8k1Gf9mOiWidcJ+1viZLCY/5GFcVW+
	 eWjeNy0bfWN56H4Psm5AHFJ+ilfztOf/fZkh4ci+63200vkqwomD+i0p+gCSzmz2nt
	 zdSXUZ0Fz6fbg==
Message-ID: <698bb967-f4d3-4e0d-a0de-c55aeb81b98d@bastelstu.be>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:52:24 +0100
Precedence: list
list-help: <mailto:internals+help@lists.php.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:internals+unsubscribe@lists.php.net>
list-post: <mailto:internals@lists.php.net>
List-Id: <internals.lists.php.net>
x-ms-reactions: disallow
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Allow Reassignment of Promoted Readonly
 Properties in Constructor
To: Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAOWwgp=JtbTSVCv9z=QGx9yS=8G72L-hcAjcOj33eEMLB0zfvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sJMXmDixLPO91P5d+5V28zhu0TVVfLxBKSUfF41JtYjkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOWwgpnToAqGN=_bj9JB8gj-2PO9gqq2SgFYYg6LmPTSmCyQ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <4b74f9a1-96d2-4104-abdd-fe56c5e7016c@app.fastmail.com>
 <CAOWwgpnrnk-a6uczGnuE76rpd9mZvwXs=SHwuo+-4fWgLm9Jcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <585bfc82-a522-43ec-be42-b8945952fe8b@app.fastmail.com>
 <CAOWwgpn-agceHfEvRhyU0UEJCCif=6znH15=-m2B8ScEngUcEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <a5f91ba2-2fad-4e46-a4a7-a597972cf460@bastelstu.be>
 <CAOWwgpmCMJxcqsyc7WXc90M1fvUhY6_3aa8P63bNJMPLR=ke0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <3cd0d869-5a5b-467c-8eb4-3f8647ba7aa7@bastelstu.be>
 <CAOWwgpm14su1A_pGFys29h0p+nzM6CLBWBYFSWLAjA2Gm93DNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6def7a03-eba4-4289-ac4f-0881c5d4c092@bastelstu.be>
 <CAOWwgpmp7xhWCmm95f0C=mG1m71inOW4wV9R_yjHTOokVcTb2w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <CAOWwgpmp7xhWCmm95f0C=mG1m71inOW4wV9R_yjHTOokVcTb2w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

On 2/23/26 08:49, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
> The RFC is ready then. Any other comments from anyone else?

Thank you. I don't have any further comments.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus