Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130054
Message-ID: <ef367e92-c8b7-43c2-ad59-f1f1669b3e26@bastelstu.be>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2026 14:55:37 +0100
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Prefix and Suffix Functions
To: Barel <barel.barelon@gmail.com>, Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CABVsiphxzSjri5BU+-HUYP2JgoGFOgN4epDTG9exVpJZFNw71g@mail.gmail.com>
 <e5ec59e24469fae8fd24b8e222d7917c@bastelstu.be>
 <CABVsipgm5LZd-_6WPVknsKKFq2Y7EQ9EUFiDYAHuSdX9B96e2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <15b6506dc69bd13eceffd36375f83509@bastelstu.be>
 <CABVsipgXrqv9Ra95oRFSqdyesEZU-AiOrZtveSPPBHPXG9EeUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABVsipiCP2DehmWpf5Z+mRjZGs2gBp8qtbuQpgEsig753Jhmqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPyj-LDi8v0MH-PkEBR8waxYoCgo=QciThha+M+WxEYsK7Bohg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20260206233458.6DEF81A00BD@lists.php.net>
 <CABVsipi6qj8Z7kzdtf7aMGmQesU-X1=XTtKAj8qugbRM32Nfsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20260207073732.D7BA81A00BD@lists.php.net>
 <CABVsipjYEYKrWF-r_=zv-k1=F1c4ho54qTwL6H1xVHO22Sk5+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <CABVsipjYEYKrWF-r_=zv-k1=F1c4ho54qTwL6H1xVHO22Sk5+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

On 2/7/26 09:21, Barel wrote:
> I have added a new section to the RFC explaining the discrepancy about
> parameter order for the _replace functions. I have also added a new
> secondary vote to decide this order. Would appreciate it if someone could
> confirm that this is all OK.

For the secondary vote you'll need to define a tie breaker. I assume the 
ties are broken in favor of `$subject` last, since that's what the RFC 
uses in all examples, but it will need to be clearly stated.

Personally I'm team “I don't think the functions are necessary, but if 
they are included, they should match str_replace()”.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus