Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130050
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 09:08:33 +0000
To: internals@lists.php.net,
 Juliette Reinders Folmer <php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl>
Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPHP-DEV=5D_=5BVote=5D_Add_form_feed_as_a_wh?=
 =?US-ASCII?Q?itespace_character_in_trim=2C_ltrim_and_rtrim?=
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <69868019.40100@adviesenzo.nl>
References: <4deea2df.a2a0.19be6247b75.Coremail.lamentxu@163.com> <20260130003750.5CA2A1A00BD@lists.php.net> <886205c77a8fdf08f4ddfb28b7605e51@bastelstu.be> <20260204011605.D6E871A00BD@lists.php.net> <9310fbfc-a7bc-44df-beac-5a46d6b14f61@app.fastmail.com> <CAMzRQTcPCx+DZQAZ6Tjahzb0USGtqAS6=dNKjpu+9Ntx-AupDA@mail.gmail.com> <8ec76a6c-3dba-4184-955c-cc8ee679a318@app.fastmail.com> <69868019.40100@adviesenzo.nl>
Message-ID: <18D991EF-0371-49F4-8193-080C8DCCA25C@php.net>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On 6 February 2026 23:58:17 GMT, Juliette Reinders Folmer <php-internals_no=
spam@adviesenzo=2Enl> wrote:
>On 5-2-2026 17:00, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026, at 11:09 AM, Volker Dusch wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 3:41=E2=80=AFPM Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldt=
ech=2Ecom> wrote:
>>>> Where as I would, because we catch flack every version for how many "=
small" BC breaks we have=2E  It hinders people's ability to upgrade and gen=
erates bad PR for PHP routinely=2E
>>>>=20
>>>> Majors exist for a reason=2E
>>>>=20
>>> That claim is completely unsubstantiated, doesn't reflect my
>>> experienced and researched reality, and feels quite off-topic, given
>>> PHP very much allows for this=2E
>> Ask Juliette or MWOP how much the "minor" BC breaks cause them issues=
=2E
>My ears were burning=2E And yes, "minor" BC breaks can definitely be huge=
ly problematic, however, the "BC-break" proposed in this RFC - to me - is n=
ot one in that category=2E Feels more like a bug-fix=2E

This is what I've been thinking all along, this is a bug fix=2E

I wasn't quite sure whether this was considered as anything else, and thin=
k a lot of time was wasted in this process=2E Process can be good when it i=
s appropriate, but that line wasn't reached for this bug fix in my opinion=
=2E=20

cheers
Derick