Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:130049
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABVsiphxzSjri5BU+-HUYP2JgoGFOgN4epDTG9exVpJZFNw71g@mail.gmail.com>
 <e5ec59e24469fae8fd24b8e222d7917c@bastelstu.be> <CABVsipgm5LZd-_6WPVknsKKFq2Y7EQ9EUFiDYAHuSdX9B96e2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <15b6506dc69bd13eceffd36375f83509@bastelstu.be> <CABVsipgXrqv9Ra95oRFSqdyesEZU-AiOrZtveSPPBHPXG9EeUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABVsipiCP2DehmWpf5Z+mRjZGs2gBp8qtbuQpgEsig753Jhmqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPyj-LDi8v0MH-PkEBR8waxYoCgo=QciThha+M+WxEYsK7Bohg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20260206233458.6DEF81A00BD@lists.php.net> <CABVsipi6qj8Z7kzdtf7aMGmQesU-X1=XTtKAj8qugbRM32Nfsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20260207073732.D7BA81A00BD@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <20260207073732.D7BA81A00BD@lists.php.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2026 09:21:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CABVsipjYEYKrWF-r_=zv-k1=F1c4ho54qTwL6H1xVHO22Sk5+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Prefix and Suffix Functions
To: Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7e72e064a379824"
From: barel.barelon@gmail.com (Barel)

--000000000000d7e72e064a379824
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I have added a new section to the RFC explaining the discrepancy about
parameter order for the _replace functions. I have also added a new
secondary vote to decide this order. Would appreciate it if someone could
confirm that this is all OK.

The voting expected to start this Monday has been cancelled and a new
discussion/cooldown period has started.

Cheers

Carlos

On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 08:39, Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net> wrote:

> On 2/7/26 01:24, Barel wrote:
> > I see that there are different opinions regarding the order of the
> > parameters for the _replace functions. Should I add a secondary vote to
> > decide this order? If I do, does there need to be a new cooldown period
> > before the vote? I am not sure about this, given this is my first RFC,
> > would appreciate some clarification on this
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Carlos
> >
>
>
> "adding, changing or removing any voting widget" is considered a major
> change and requires a 14-day cooldown period. If you decide to add a
> secondary vote for the parameter order, you'd need to announce the
> change here on the list and allow 14 more days for discussion. This
> gives everyone enough chance to see the changes and make any comments
> before voting begins.
>
> I would personally be in favor of either changing the proposed parameter
> order or adding a secondary vote to decide the order.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>

--000000000000d7e72e064a379824
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I have added a new section to the RFC explaining the discr=
epancy about parameter order for the _replace functions. I have also added =
a new secondary vote to decide this order. Would appreciate it if someone c=
ould confirm that=C2=A0this is all OK.<br><br>The voting expected to start =
this Monday has been cancelled and a new discussion/cooldown period has sta=
rted.<br><br>Cheers<br><br>Carlos</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_=
quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 a=
t 08:39, Ben Ramsey &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ramsey@php.net">ramsey@php.net</a=
>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px=
 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On =
2/7/26 01:24, Barel wrote:<br>
&gt; I see that there are different opinions regarding the order of the<br>
&gt; parameters for the _replace functions. Should I add a secondary vote t=
o<br>
&gt; decide this order? If I do, does there need to be a new cooldown perio=
d<br>
&gt; before the vote? I am not sure about this, given this is my first RFC,=
<br>
&gt; would appreciate some clarification on this<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Thanks!<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Carlos<br>
&gt; <br>
<br>
<br>
&quot;adding, changing or removing any voting widget&quot; is considered a =
major <br>
change and requires a 14-day cooldown period. If you decide to add a <br>
secondary vote for the parameter order, you&#39;d need to announce the <br>
change here on the list and allow 14 more days for discussion. This <br>
gives everyone enough chance to see the changes and make any comments <br>
before voting begins.<br>
<br>
I would personally be in favor of either changing the proposed parameter <b=
r>
order or adding a secondary vote to decide the order.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Ben<br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000d7e72e064a379824--