Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:129845 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9A81A00BC for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:22:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1769073751; bh=ivz1vpxdmVA7UAXEFbrGeWfok63ZZCOzHW+lGRJVtMA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=c397jW+DwhNApHqUtYPnmuUwHZd963euZfyS9YI04Vt6SDBMnpNzqlj52hD/G2WkL 577kWOZTy4Dm0rj8kKFhFJNe9UEJbp13zMLiOoFH7bSNO9kPeYKFWn4Apkr3QlLTbt LBbgl8qznWqKCx14U/kNIweR9gkYzAaP6rzyPG5qjxrfgBtnfp4XrOZ0lvNUvN62As enrBolYg6Rjj/6/9+PkradJI3Tx4w0bTqqpU9VoLBaVPfb37JcOUjMwu6Mz41z0z5G d5QQUy2fAYKpd3qnDyYyfXVJqdHWcdqCs661fIj2ygS1B13bdDpGbjxW5G1j5DUyPP eCBHlYkc58TzQ== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A311805B2 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:22:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DMARC_NONE, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from 4.mo583.mail-out.ovh.net (4.mo583.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.111.247]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from director5.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.54.112]) by mo583.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dxbDr1K6xz6TDW for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ghost-submission-7d8d68f679-xnfhq (unknown [10.111.182.110]) by director5.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8FD91006E0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from php.earth ([37.59.142.104]) by ghost-submission-7d8d68f679-xnfhq with ESMTPSA id FY6QI0vscWmsqgQA6bM/YQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:22:19 +0000 Authentication-Results:garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-104R005d0a6f5bd-fca5-4e33-8852-996fc4f7fbab, 130285FCAB125E8849D06A2DA8C986C683B1C034) smtp.auth=peter.kokot@php.earth X-OVh-ClientIp:209.85.218.51 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b87677a8abeso101390066b.1 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 01:22:19 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWYOQGwaL5DWqEXi/4rbNO7I2lATicqcoxjA+bltPv2B9OGWk+2QuO4Pp+P9X3b78HLwOasdHTkWzg=@lists.php.net X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyD/bmwkwyf2r31jlS4QqSHbCACKbm5GGmen0IdwyRE45WNzuwE 0tmyfbOD3ue/cjuMjufGrkz/fAo8IVKiE8maBgSKtnKKRJUKhA1jHjVKnjZsgmMWmMSKm7jHHOL r3bwkQ+IBAtMRSD6p+2sa67VMgYUcejU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7304:b0:b7c:f5b6:bb52 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b879327e17bmr1964354866b.43.1769073739171; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 01:22:19 -0800 (PST) Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <79CDB2CC-E397-436E-B5A2-10DA1E451A97@rwec.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:22:07 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: AZwV_QjCAYngQ7OTJ9tm0rjEXuSXheIb06xQFOEcuA-3tIHeM6Cfd1jBcrdYyHg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] True Async RFC 1.7 To: Edmond Dantes Cc: "Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]" , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce0cfa0648f69330" X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 17026702817232282118 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: 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 From: petk@php.net (Peter Kokot) --000000000000ce0cfa0648f69330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Da. -- Peter Kokot On Thu, Jan 22, 2026, 10:07 Edmond Dantes wrote: > Hello. > > > Indeed, nobody does, and that is a problem. It's not an insurmountable > problem though: we just have to bootstrap our way towards one. > Even if a project is governed democratically, a decision-making > hierarchy must exist. > > I have nothing against development processes. I don=E2=80=99t consider th= em > bureaucracy. I consider it bureaucracy when there is an attempt to > imitate development processes. > Bureaucracy is the creation of an illusion of work, which should be > avoided. A good decision-making flow, on the other hand, is a > completely different matter. > > Theoretically, I could of course create an RFC to change the PHP > development processes, including the voting principles. > It=E2=80=99s "possible", but it would most likely be extremely inefficien= t. > > I currently have two options. > > 1. I can run a vote with several questions to find out what people > actually want. > 2. Help with implementing changes to the decision-making processes, if > there is such a desire. > > ---- > Best regards, Ed > --000000000000ce0cfa0648f69330 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Da.

--
Peter Kokot

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026, 10:07 Edmond Dantes <edmond.ht@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello.

> Indeed, nobody does, and that is a problem. It's not an insurmount= able problem though: we just have to bootstrap our way towards one.
Even if a project is governed democratically, a decision-making
hierarchy must exist.

I have nothing against development processes. I don=E2=80=99t consider them=
bureaucracy. I consider it bureaucracy when there is an attempt to
imitate development processes.
Bureaucracy is the creation of an illusion of work, which should be
avoided. A good decision-making flow, on the other hand, is a
completely different matter.

Theoretically, I could of course create an RFC to change the PHP
development processes, including the voting principles.
It=E2=80=99s "possible", but it would most likely be extremely in= efficient.

I currently have two options.

1. I can run a vote with several questions to find out what people
actually want.
2. Help with implementing changes to the decision-making processes, if
there is such a desire.

----
Best regards, Ed
--000000000000ce0cfa0648f69330--