Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:129687 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A771A00BC for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 13:31:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1766583108; bh=6JEsKSL2CBrl1whbCXWx0wEtYVIp3xRVPfgiscJ+rdI=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=JLThOUlKr7MCMf6vMrYNzePG9Bv+kYkqn/5CHvI2QbK5IKIgymoSdd9fLkEV2bxAI NtJ4/ZU647MrMSJ519viJ1Gux3+5OzpEW6YYrbndC9rCNUa4rPCYPJUcVbObyYEuzd hDgpdsoF1HL/z1qcoBaXF8bl3goau5ofgp8MqP+SbCX/hzak+qbzAE8zGClQBqs8Be WwDNKS0aKYwH09Ib5Wv8izctCxHYuixs6H0XFfE7pgiB21xJEzV/ja72n+1mDdfwIh sSTdDcIyDJ21vtWTCnGi8XaA0FGXYSWtWD3jyU4/O+r2oa584YObYVOldYulm/Bw/A Yg7WqkC1wJEzA== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD28180080 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 13:31:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail.gna.ch (darkcity.gna.ch [84.234.28.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 13:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17762381188 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:31:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cschneid.com; s=default; t=1766583098; bh=6JEsKSL2CBrl1whbCXWx0wEtYVIp3xRVPfgiscJ+rdI=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=CTXqwzrLS0i3Iom03m7s80Mow3tqfafbxPMopJPDlbHG9x6qkq0Qidt4aAuavCHPv KAFh3iHiGKUuWabiaQj1k9g8d2Tqy2Y01ipT//wElM2PWi08/BuIwpU9DhUIIxYpSt Wdx+XtclKCBGGkOkFLmEgvpKEQdqbkQM/RdqesJc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gna.ch Received: from mail.gna.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.gna.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lu6CzaQvpaHe for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:31:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:1210:2e2d:4d00:cc10:a7a2:2e77:449f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BBC523800E5 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:31:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cschneid.com; s=default; t=1766583098; bh=6JEsKSL2CBrl1whbCXWx0wEtYVIp3xRVPfgiscJ+rdI=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=CTXqwzrLS0i3Iom03m7s80Mow3tqfafbxPMopJPDlbHG9x6qkq0Qidt4aAuavCHPv KAFh3iHiGKUuWabiaQj1k9g8d2Tqy2Y01ipT//wElM2PWi08/BuIwpU9DhUIIxYpSt Wdx+XtclKCBGGkOkFLmEgvpKEQdqbkQM/RdqesJc= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.300.41.1.7\)) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Idea] Short echo tag with automatic HTML escaping () Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:31:37 +0100 References: <7c592a80-76a5-4b16-9c7b-a354aa34802a@mail.ru> <03590ce8-8037-4409-bc0e-603c692fe349@sandfox.me> <827cd223-226d-43c6-97f6-ccbe5492fb5e@mail.ru> To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.300.41.1.7) From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Am 24.12.2025 um 09:14 schrieb Rob Landers : > I know this is not your intent, but this will give people a false = sense of security. Much like Twig and Blade do today. I think this is an important point as many on this list will object to = such a feature because of this. What I mean by this: The main obstacle is not the specific syntax but = the feature in general. I mean this as a heads-up for the original poster to be not too = disappointed when (not "if" - in my personal opinion) it gets shot down. > Here's some examples where this breaks, written in the context of an = html doc: This is just the tip of the iceberg. > Maybe, you should consider something like this: >=20 >