Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:129411 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C2521A00BC for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2025 16:59:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1763917177; bh=RA5xXjNyvwr4IeNuax6W2Dn4TlV1+PbwYZ9LOYzeRHs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=OQiNXSVFA5ESfXHyXNAG6TNNuOULO+Hphh0bii16gwpYC4ZeDgcOo6z7aMbqsnq82 /j0Hzdn4ZdJ4iuJH5A1SiyOh8Ovv0r9e7mPR2sH2JbLoJm9mIyhHte+AWyeRM+aSYj NbEi/UQMsyyYTuhBcZnCBwSiXSzPM/qoZXdjbMjRUKULfeJNPGJtn1crX1ueRwfjnG SIbRlWZXBEpLGmCZ7a+2ZDuVJoMaQgQ4KtlLZ4OouEhFyuEMD++CC09EqBiA3b81+I dSTxjRlpi3Hh5fOSfjtgAkfJME4YHfX5d/qjwdMkLC9JEbN3peo66dF53BY68Ixv5/ kO6HRgEVpeMAQ== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F5C18007E for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2025 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DMARC_NONE, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, T_SPF_TEMPERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oi1-f177.google.com (mail-oi1-f177.google.com [209.85.167.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2025 16:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-450b5338459so1498496b6e.2 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2025 08:59:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1763917167; x=1764521967; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RA5xXjNyvwr4IeNuax6W2Dn4TlV1+PbwYZ9LOYzeRHs=; b=peqFDJjR6zrSUT5qiFmpst3IWAsp8rtJBrpMN7+13Ub5bjMWvUejtueXfH6gCGIfTK QeOo+em6mYjXLgMs3oSuX8oP6dNI2ssiNnYENAALcXBK9NDW4mBESxuYJbo41I72rs8C saBfTT+MHbgdVQNQnZe9BbWqLOi0eQrFaclVHS02uAR++xtS891KyZ8YY1pkYhdyzo37 rotCFbifiwSoecMa45gWT7uTt8jrwlCvD8wt/xTjxBaBecA3rdqTFSIBBZrEO089c5sh 9PxS3cPSZlbhMWLQmGmxJXDaTe9Y8WEzgifYkRA2AisxY3g8p5vppE7ds89M5VN1CgfI Q4Uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyv4BlIVAdXrXZn70XCDGhnUjRfpnlzY55ef9NMQSoQkBSKV3LK rLgdRup0JtHMlWFhmqMLNEj04fhfMRzOzeMUjFT877Gueng/Kl2ZR1GV/UF+sr/eD/UgtemLLTT DWhvdLbheZkQr1QbeDZueUqVtS6tMZYsPm0QwL+M= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuM8ZstpOCPwa340wSWG6aCLxUiPa84E7qQ6Lnm6enLxj2h1QXRmoHD6lY2C/M a276rKl2rbmKq0hGw9zu/41XNwS20/8e5wYlx2pFvVN4fLo5z1D7peRQs955GWqSGTjZoFvTM/C RQ0qKeTDxTGbuxIgg2z0f7j84N3+nMLkagTODI7Oj1z50hgrm9JzAA/5UxTuTveHD4WWO2rHBGE 8XYtfE8eRLfGCWsT7vXFBqamDeZrjdHkOOvSFfsar4JAv4dIMWKpHj/ZOPQUlkmxx0RHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGkYEePY+0W6zDg8tk0XQ6/SFCbXRbfdfm2UVgUi9pQVj/tKdpqu+VpcvaRpL+6gVo1syrgYA5MVGXJU9k7zI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2f16:b0:439:af2f:d1d5 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-45112b41805mr3761900b6e.39.1763917167144; Sun, 23 Nov 2025 08:59:27 -0800 (PST) Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 17:59:15 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bnMnbfHR7JUjBERJea2mI7rWJV2PLjB2PAxlzJpipHstf7vBayXeAjVw8c Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] True Async RFC 1.6 To: Edmond Dantes Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000029310e064445f8a2" From: bukka@php.net (Jakub Zelenka) --00000000000029310e064445f8a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 1:37=E2=80=AFPM Edmond Dantes = wrote: > Hello all > > According to all previous discussions, version 1.6 of this RFC has > been prepared and is now being submitted for a vote: > > Voting Page: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true_async/voting > RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true_async > > The vote officially starts tomorrow, as previously announced. > Just note here that you effectively started the vote on Nov 19th (votes were already coming in so that should be the official start). There were changes to the policy that were merged on Nov 20th so they should apply from that date. The current text is following: https://github.com/php/policies/blob/c2a1c602deee3988a9ce9cb740169973f5f4a7= 81/feature-proposals.rst . If it was started after that merge, this RFC would be automatically invalid (there wasn't proper pre-announcement and so on) but as it started before, I think it's still a valid vote. It means that you have only 3 days to either stop the vote or you will need to let it finish. If it fails, you won't be able to propose this for for another 6 months unless significant changes are done. I guess it will need significant changes anyway but just wanted to let you know what the options are here in terms of stopping the vote. Kind regards, Jakub --00000000000029310e064445f8a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 1:37= =E2=80=AFPM Edmond Dantes <edmond= .ht@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all

According to all previous discussions, version 1.6 of this RFC has
been prepared and is now being submitted for a vote:

Voting Page: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true_async/voting
RFC
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true_async

The vote officially starts tomorrow, as previously announced.


Just n= ote here that you effectively started the vote on Nov 19th (votes were alre= ady coming in so that should be the official start). There were changes to = the policy that were merged on Nov 20th so they should apply from that date= . The current text is following: https= ://github.com/php/policies/blob/c2a1c602deee3988a9ce9cb740169973f5f4a781/fe= ature-proposals.rst . If it was started after that merge, this RFC woul= d be automatically invalid (there wasn't proper pre-announcement and so= on) but as it started before, I think it's still a valid vote. It mean= s that you have only 3 days to either stop the vote or you will need to let= it finish. If it fails, you won't be able to propose this for for anot= her 6 months unless significant changes are done. I guess it will need sign= ificant changes anyway but just wanted to let you know what the options are= here in terms of stopping the vote.

Kind regards,=

Jakub=C2=A0
--00000000000029310e064445f8a2--