Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:128912 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4BF91A00BC for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:19:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1761160776; bh=4S1QHPzB7Qts/k7PKJx/kwoU3v9ORP6WdE764v+MIXk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=nvLArOKN2MXkTC80khzfCAzP5B+AJm7lMcgGDTgQHa/Ed7RJwt1oCTAAJLh+KSzPB jKzw9qd8fSAyLVumBFZZx7gEnc877eYws/otp7XPfeGWXnyDxDzNSnldFYBXMnYZb/ Gt4ggz4Oi4OJYRPAMu0kQZCfYO2t5txrmBG8QNNlnR0nczKwA5hCNygsrg/Vnh5wpx YdGr7bEU6sXA4frF/GfMgF9OWfZTu9SwoMA0CO4URamPQa0fkcUNtWlzD0Mc6+3uuw cyNoFW8/ynZj2JBEgkDg30H6ef8wR2n86t5Of5OiGy9CuQ6oho1nzkbvVsaf7wByTg Zpuri5dFzmhjg== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A6F1801D6 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:19:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_MISSING,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mx.kolabnow.com (mx.kolabnow.com [212.103.80.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C3030061C7 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:19:26 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=alec.pl DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alec.pl; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received:received; s=dkim2; t=1761160765; x=1762975166; bh=52CpR1SvW5Zu8wbJgqKBdin qeaHf2pbBu/ECUaTQVoo=; b=Sfq5k2YLIHWKmAQYdvk88v+aCnS7ErM5r7v7Nei LRmodiJdVvufbU0QrajbVqWLBSE9Rer/CYMkSR4YBZUAd7d7+pVS7N17vZQlPpzs 1LfB/csZz/Qg0FTsSDnGQRTEiQNMRiNCB6pmbBVUPum6ziKR0dJFdHja6YQ7mIoj A4RoxqdaJgWNqezOkqbCbEPbcvwKizMtjfmG2y2R+To0/6W4/a7E4S3jEFeEf9xn RT8vQap024MDx89gZELpsTP4qowoXl2apzc0cvMYWp/CooZmBi76o4wEnZpFEIwQ ZcH+qdC7G7HBidX0TrtWoBp7Iw+BI4hQ+btpTLwp4m0ULsw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out013.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0k4wMrKQPDC for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:19:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx009.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.9]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92CA33003DA7 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:19:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx009.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D27B20AA958 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:19:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:19:24 +0200 Precedence: list list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP True Async RFC Stage 4 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <25be6748-d8c3-4f1a-bf81-297cea72f8db@alec.pl> Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=alec@alec.pl; keydata= xsBNBEy9TtkBCAC4ef0IJaqTDQNQZ5CPrHvNs5kcACvtffwydrTcRJ28dHwjZD8daSxfVYEo acyARevTOvsp36Vgq8Yt7ATu6y7MPBaPj9Lq0kwX7HM8QDn8jTfufAgMjxcw5bD+JNR5+8G9 hUF3F35gVuAd471hS+QB/Ug/PezcNx9H5yFUMuvrO3ybyIDhw5qJI2RoJMjMr5DPKUG7z810 1e/NW7y9FfHq+Ony7A70w+vcfv1L+LLX5gfrpKI3m0zKm7cj1vyxZfC9RijIzWZN3GgExexI KJdbkcg9F/zigKo72TJhgvjy6YZP03HmWZVcpsd3aIT3Tweg0cCivaKVBNcFR1oda6XvABEB AAHNFkEuTC5FLkMgPGFsZWNAYWxlYy5wbD7CwHsEEwECACUCGyMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheABQJMvVAwAhkBAAoJEL7mdKAZNZ3BEhkH/1eAuCOSXsWg8YwZzmABoKKZfNpJ Z3QTwAMxXyCPjJMwLMLHsrVO+VbGupFcIW/q/3bvt1r8LwPB73rg0TFiHoYzeQzdnOVYFW7w OYz9BDVjLE4goDk6xN5Nj1CpBMXzQFdr3HVKyuRK1CLd9p13CofiBlLsQ4JqtosnlvSCEjTL yIajACU3kY2je1e58N5VHzZ+VMeg2xbuQJ3q1iTkYggZ+xRC1muw4Xgt2vxgfWjn7u3dmjYM T3H2WFprLZwliejHgzhWdYABdyCU5VuGCLOV+xk2UCADya0hvVVIezA/4YG3w01yjsljRrKy HFJUqw+MqagA6dsfflZSvmROKMbOwE0ETL1O2QEIANHbid+rMQ/IX0/UyVtnLWunDEg6Yl2B twHTecZ4Ym3tBxc1sbPDoYpY0DZ86gYi9DCbolrdjnrRK9ldYItVJ8rJUkEIDz/2yhjcr3s3 p2SyI94bocoG0WW+VRlssJMxTB2ihblihkY5HqT+9PgOFxnpSqz1ksTaI3JOVcokidhoB7MJ muyb28rNtZCJP7upRUwBSoZfHiL83w3Ad1Fn49QVO7kshH11lNyJ9jB17BTl1I0sj7RPqAor JcMxsSOJXW71ZcipXWym+GacY/qziQw7bT9CQYSmr4SiRV7GahD91enDkdv+pUAnb8NEifQ1 LT26XcL6Ng9EbG5AT4qI46kAEQEAAcLAXwQYAQIACQUCTL1O2QIbDAAKCRC+5nSgGTWdwe2T CACaux3lHitD8IIO5fy6RxPqym6vMlKiN0IyilahtJ0A2htNqwbFb6TukpzKw04DGSPEOGPa o4hdsLtQtqAPwqrR+FGJDc6V/jD0rPjThC3NcvkJuoi622ZLCsi8TAL5kBmF2NYd7ejszB31 5EzvpXSeES8+9pv6yshzUborEg9QKhPxW0yvrdj2OwFUlRr6/jLpKmMLzSx5F0yEg10urvfe 9Sttk5TVzHycOa1nKSzj79F1jXTl/mji/i082s1nlwb8d6LNVrm0e1tGMxSk/WpghFVVSm4O MvUvMkEEDkwGsm+mPcmX4UPcvq/wU3hGhDeVlpkfVTJQGvDbEUzTXbz6 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: alec@alec.pl (Aleksander Machniak) On 22.10.2025 19:01, Edmond Dantes wrote: >> - The glossary in "Overview" is good, but probably incomplete. The >> examples there, with no description, do not help much and could be >> removed, imo. > > Do I understand correctly that I should remove the examples without > descriptions? Examples in the Overview section aren't very helpful. I would remove them from there, but maybe some of them need to appear later. I didn't read it that carefully to suggest precise changes. > Or would it be better to add descriptions to them? > Although the last examples might not be very illustrative or easy to grasp. > >> the "Scheduler and Reactor" section does not explain much over what's in the glossary. > > What else do you think could be added? > The internal implementation doesn’t belong in the scope of the RFC, it > can change. > They don’t have any special API in the PHP userland. > The reactor can only be used directly at the C/C++ level, meaning > within a PHP extension. > It’s also intentionally impossible to directly affect the Scheduler’s behavior. I think that it might be better to not mention them at all in the RFC. Or better separate parts that describe userland and engine. The structure of the Proposal is a bit chaotic. -- Aleksander Machniak Kolab Groupware Developer [https://kolab.org] Roundcube Webmail Developer [https://roundcube.net] ---------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 # Blog: https://kolabian.wordpress.com