Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:128864
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMW7n8DGbFnQzjt3s9CcOBwhp+MUOV+K3U=yY=ULOTdUXaOLHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMW7n8Dcp4VGmR-cL4AO7s5cvbHLYHxXJg8LdpqAas7Z5KUEiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMW7n8Dcp4VGmR-cL4AO7s5cvbHLYHxXJg8LdpqAas7Z5KUEiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 13:29:07 +0300
Message-ID: <CAAwdEzA9Bv-rPHGOzttNkjZYr=xiEeZWATYtDtwsu201-qRvpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP True Async RFC Stage 4
To: Edmond Dantes <edmond.ht@gmail.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4313f064180703e"
From: drealecs@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Alexandru_P=C4=83tr=C4=83nescu?=)

--000000000000d4313f064180703e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 8:06=E2=80=AFAM Edmond Dantes <edmond.ht@gmail.com>=
 wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Tomorrow marks two weeks since the RFC was published, which means
> that, formally, it is now eligible to be submitted for voting.
>
>
>
I just want to say that the amount of effort put into this is really
impressive. So, thank you!

At the same time, the reviewing effort is also big, and I can hope you will
keep this in mind. There is no need to go with the minimum period of two
weeks.
I would very much want to see this proposal succeed. I think you should
allow for a lengthier review period so that people will have enough time to
contribute their thoughts and ideas, to make sure all unclarities are
cleared up, and so, to have a better chance of being accepted.

Thank you again,
Alex

--000000000000d4313f064180703e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi,</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_co=
ntainer"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 8:06=
=E2=80=AFAM Edmond Dantes &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:edmond.ht@gmail.com">edmond=
.ht@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddi=
ng-left:1ex">Hello everyone,<br>
<br>
Tomorrow marks two weeks since the RFC was published, which means<br>
that, formally, it is now eligible to be submitted for voting.<br>
<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I just want to say that the amount=
 of effort put into this is really impressive. So, thank you!</div><div><br=
></div><div>At the same time, the reviewing effort is also big, and I can h=
ope you will keep this in mind. There is no need to go with the minimum per=
iod of two weeks.</div><div>I would very much want to see this proposal suc=
ceed. I think you should allow for a lengthier review period so that people=
 will have enough time to contribute their thoughts and ideas, to make sure=
 all unclarities are cleared up, and so, to have a better chance of being a=
ccepted.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you again,</div><div>Alex</div><div=
><br></div></div></div>

--000000000000d4313f064180703e--