Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:128671
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:57:40 +0200
To: Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net>
Cc: Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com>, PHP Internals List
 <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Soft-Deprecate __sleep() and __wakeup()
In-Reply-To: <CAEKnhAGZZrcX3Hkee_dsXWVx05QYsV8dX7zRSStduv2TTZvKGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOWwgpk1Z_bns=Z55TqpYOBXvBGpurMfjTGPSgQ6Uf5QXfLOjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <cddcbba0366184b616e34637b424645e@bastelstu.be>
 <CAEKnhAGZZrcX3Hkee_dsXWVx05QYsV8dX7zRSStduv2TTZvKGg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56f489e612d44bb7339aa3ea64c708be@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2025-09-10 17:39, schrieb Jakub Zelenka:
>> A recent RFC to deprecate the __sleep() and __wakeup() magic methods 
>> in
> favor of __serialize() and __unserialize() passed (18–9), but only just 
> met
> the required 2/3 majority.
> 
> Hope it's better! :)

Thank you, the updated phrasing is better indeed. Factually stating that 
it just met the required majority (while stating the majority) is 
something different than saying it a close vote, which leaves room for 
ambiguity.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus