Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:128630 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E8F1A00BC for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:40:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1756975159; bh=KYsopCTSn2i7C4eXeoYL7Vt0OmQEKEilSTvfZR3LlN8=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:From; b=Yi+UhFDLKUE2eZu3TU9KC1ComaZjON0iWH72+XVFgdAWPmVu1YyAJnzSpWu1DXa88 ezfRh/tLz22dlG3dIyNZwCX22/In0T1auENygGgYcksFRy5hEi2waQncyaM7K65gQy zo18D68IPHa8iJUBi0EoHO5nGMZBMVi1G7qKKCOWRwnUC50JPcKMqOKeNM0tLTw4go JUTQhCFc1wEsastv/lUhqZjnGBNADixP6lBPZW1jyU/wIpU2Hu2Rgu3p2vRmY3w3yj 8t6OCsn46vVgIMZsaFkfmsJEO4uA5WwC+ISZFFuocyoy7qvLw+gFRTj+zL4GCQ/6FS WSCQhBeLCSigA== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910BB1801ED for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:39:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from 102a.hosted.hey.com (102a.hosted.hey.com [204.62.115.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hey.com (bigip-vip.rw-ash-int.37signals.com [10.20.0.24]) by 102.hosted.hey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AAE7FFA3; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:40:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=archte.ch; s=heymail; t=1756975246; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=XlZQa7wqQcP89tGXnwBS5pCMUFtc94u3qj7NwkRQsgU=; b=QC1zqB7Nj9oyMHaxaQL56+T0WqIFApGcFOb6NvElSlRlCOv7D5Jm0YRtjAq5bZ1t00U/d1 5cBgWqkYnWSWQRq+WOTzSY+TQPYKvxABEZXfDxaKvCLmnmN2118T/lHcXx3kpBwzodVuMD Y4UFwZT+AEptOr6aUP/vWgXowvtZrITNku3v+8zmkzNujxmvdYB+61s6gOi1ajmwmBftXO QkYlVnQgghS9WZ6O1xm9UbKgeNd6KH8v674yk6dY/cAeI9RhnWQrXI37x243ECSZSd4xK0 d1sSzCwNaO0tw72U7r+UtU9iq2ExtFvVn7fC4u9/dIldCvgoWP1GxLNYxdipYA== Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:40:46 +0200 To: PHP internals list , Matteo Beccati Message-ID: <568a0b0e0228b340f7993e2b66b299fa9685d400@hey.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO\Sqlite: Add transaction mode attribute Precedence: list list-help: list-post: List-Id: x-ms-reactions: disallow Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_68b9508eab338_8c2015045816"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: samuel@archte.ch (=?UTF-8?B?U2FtdWVsIMWgdGFuY2w=?=) References: ----==_mimepart_68b9508eab338_8c2015045816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matteo, From reading earlier discussions my understanding is the feature freeze only applies to things that need RFCs. With PRs that add simple constants not necessarily needing an RFC. Personally I think the diff in the linked PR itself matches that description well, while the alternative implementation in the comment seems more likely to need an RFC. If I need RM approval how would I go about that. Email one of the RMs individually? Thank you. Samuel =C5=A0tancl On September 4, 2025, Matteo Beccati wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > Il 04/09/2025 00:38, Samuel =C5=A0tancl ha scritto: > > Hi, > >=C2=A0 > > Is there anything I could do here to get this reviewed before the > 8.5=C2=A0 > > release? As mentioned earlier the proposed implementation should not > be=C2=A0 > > subject to the feature freeze. > >=C2=A0 > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/19317 > > src/pull/19317> > > I think the 8.5 ship has sailed. Why should it not be subject to > feature=C2=A0 > freeze? It surely is, unless the RMs approve it. > > > Cheers > --=C2=A0 > Matteo Beccati ----==_mimepart_68b9508eab338_8c2015045816 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Matteo,

From reading earlier discussions my understandin= g is the feature freeze only applies to things that need RFCs. With PRs t= hat add simple constants not necessarily needing an RFC.

Personall= y I think the diff in the linked PR itself matches that description well,= while the alternative implementation in the comment seems more likely to= need an RFC.

If I need RM approval how would I go about that. Ema= il one of the RMs individually?

Thank you.

Samue= l =C5=A0tancl


On September 4, 2025, Matteo B= eccati <php@beccati.com> wrote:
Hi Samuel,

= Il 04/09/2025 00:38, Samuel =C5=A0tancl ha scritto:
> Hi,
>=C2= =A0
> Is there anything I could do here to get this reviewed before= the 8.5=C2=A0
> release? As mentioned earlier the proposed impleme= ntation should not be=C2=A0
> subject to the feature freeze.
>= ;=C2=A0
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/19317 <https://git= hub.com/php/php-=C2=A0
> src/pull/19317>

I think the 8.5 = ship has sailed. Why should it not be subject to feature=C2=A0
freeze?= It surely is, unless the RMs approve it.


Cheers
--=C2=A0Matteo Beccati
----==_mimepart_68b9508eab338_8c2015045816--