Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12862 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7007 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Sep 2004 13:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6580 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 13:32:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO colo.lerdorf.com) (66.198.51.121) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 13:32:04 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-6-200-247.client.comcast.net [24.6.200.247]) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-13) with ESMTP id i8GDVxNO018208; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:31:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:31:56 -0700 (PDT) X-X-Sender: rasmus@t42p.lerdorf.com To: Joe Orton cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20040916104604.GB6809@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20040916093900.GA6842@redhat.com> <20040916101531.GA6809@redhat.com> <20040916104604.GB6809@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] use -prefer-non-pic on x86-{freebsd,linux} From: rasmus@php.net (Rasmus Lerdorf) On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > The point is that the current behaviour needs to be retained > > for installations which would be negatively affected by your > > patch. Building non-PIC as default is ok, if a switch is > > provided to build PIC. > > Ah, gotcha. Any preference as to flag name? --disable-non-pic would be > an obvious choice, confusing double negative though. There is already a --without-pic/--with-pic flag that just doesn't work. I'd key it off of that. -Rasmus