Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12859 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80656 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Sep 2004 11:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80632 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 11:32:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (216.239.56.249) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 11:32:29 -0000 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w67so437cwb for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.117.69 with SMTP id p69mr1505cwc; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.117.13 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4e89b42604091604321554fbea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:32:29 +0100 Reply-To: Wez Furlong To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20040916104604.GB6809@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040916093900.GA6842@redhat.com> <20040916101531.GA6809@redhat.com> <20040916104604.GB6809@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] use -prefer-non-pic on x86-{freebsd,linux} From: kingwez@gmail.com (Wez Furlong) Something like this sounds right: --enable-slow-pic Build a slower DSO that can be used to run multiple concurrent Apache instances. You don't need this unless you know why you need it. Which gets me thinking... how does this affect other SAPI (like CLI, embed) and extensions? --Wez. On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:46:04 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > The point is that the current behaviour needs to be retained > > for installations which would be negatively affected by your > > patch. Building non-PIC as default is ok, if a switch is > > provided to build PIC. > > Ah, gotcha. Any preference as to flag name? --disable-non-pic would be > an obvious choice, confusing double negative though. > > joe