Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12858 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33642 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Sep 2004 10:46:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33586 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 10:46:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 10:46:07 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8GAk6AB015111 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:46:06 -0400 Received: from radish.cambridge.redhat.com (radish.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.90]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8GAk6r19533 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:46:06 -0400 Received: from radish.cambridge.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by radish.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i8GAk5NE011328 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:46:05 +0100 Received: (from jorton@localhost) by radish.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8GAk4nQ011327 for internals@lists.php.net; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:46:04 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:46:04 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20040916104604.GB6809@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: internals@lists.php.net References: <20040916093900.GA6842@redhat.com> <20040916101531.GA6809@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] use -prefer-non-pic on x86-{freebsd,linux} From: jorton@redhat.com (Joe Orton) On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: > The point is that the current behaviour needs to be retained > for installations which would be negatively affected by your > patch. Building non-PIC as default is ok, if a switch is > provided to build PIC. Ah, gotcha. Any preference as to flag name? --disable-non-pic would be an obvious choice, confusing double negative though. joe