Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:128514
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:40:06 +0100
To: internals@lists.php.net, Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net>,
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tim_D=FCsterhus?= <tim@bastelstu.be>
CC: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] "Abstain" voting option for RFCs
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAEKnhAEh_BMYM-a4X6PYrvsp01fMNtaLsuFrMDzVDneYZ9m6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b614a9d6-3bcd-4da8-a229-f2610fbb2740@bastelstu.be> <CAEKnhAEh_BMYM-a4X6PYrvsp01fMNtaLsuFrMDzVDneYZ9m6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <46E856C5-0CE6-4ACF-B824-C965B25EC385@php.net>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On 19 August 2025 14:14:07 BST, Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php=2Enet> wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 4:42=E2=80=AFPM Tim D=C3=BCsterhus <tim@bastelstu=
=2Ebe> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I just opened the vote for the "'Abstain' voting option for RFCs" polic=
y
>> RFC:
>>
>> RFC: https://wiki=2Ephp=2Enet/rfc/rfc_vote_abstain
>> Discussion: https://news-web=2Ephp=2Enet/php=2Einternals/128185
>> PR: https://news-web=2Ephp=2Enet/php=2Einternals/128185
>>
>> As with every RFC, a 2/3 majority is required=2E Voting ends 2025-08-31=
 at
>> 15:00:00 UTC=2E
>>
>> The vote already includes the =E2=80=9CAbstain=E2=80=9D option to dogfo=
od the RFC and to
>> showcase how the voting widget will look like should the RFC be
>> accepted=2E Although it could be argued that selecting the =E2=80=9CAbs=
tain=E2=80=9D
>> option would be a vote in favor of having such an option, it will be
>> considered an abstention=2E Please vote =E2=80=9CYes=E2=80=9D if you ar=
e in favor of the
>> RFC :-)
>>
>>
>I don't have issue with this=2E The only minor cosmetic thing is that it
>makes the table wider so it will more often not fit to the mobile screen
>and will need horizontal scroll=2E I think the solution for that could be=
 to
>remove that user name in brackets that just repeats the linked name - e=
=2Eg
>bukka (bukka)=2E That would be nice to do as part of the "implementation"=
 for
>this=2E=2E=2E :)
>
>Regards
>
>Jakub

It's the long commit hash in the table that makes it wide in this case=2E

But I can have a look at getting rid of the duplication (regardless of whe=
ther the RFC passes)

cheers
Derick