Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:127793
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 09:28:52 +0200
To: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Partial Function Application v2
In-Reply-To: <b2f466e6-b9d8-4aec-a275-e7ae7c4b67ff@app.fastmail.com>
References: <b2f466e6-b9d8-4aec-a275-e7ae7c4b67ff@app.fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <2be2b865335201e2b6a859c12188e8bd@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2025-06-28 07:06, schrieb Larry Garfield:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/partial_function_application_v2

Some thoughts, I did not yet take an in-depth look:

- Will PFA be available in constant-expressions, following the “First 
Class Callables in constant expressions” RFC 
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fcc_in_const_expr)?
- It would be good to include an example section not using a regular 
“free-standing” function in the RFC. The RFC already mentions that all 
callables are supported, but explicitly showing an example for the 
possible alternative syntaxes (including `$foo->bar(?)` and `$foo(?)` 
would be useful.
- Starting with the “RFC Impact” section, several sections of the 
template are not filled in.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus