Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:127672 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by lists.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719941A00BC for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:06:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1750079069; bh=HYq8kAkJd997DQ6vForl3JG7w0c/bOLG4uhul0Pz0UQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UsA2ISYdhcWSrmY9ZCX5ag5o/apRnx2hlVWhwYJfem5+qHrOOwjDpuk53YY79dFPS p60bOPrpc8WN5NluKQe2v/vWAW81ioXUlYrPQP+dIr/S5xyftz2Omku9o+WAQZN41t wfkXlY4w3s+pf74dJwpkCt4F/qoAPnkxcJOux/bV408yVOCDPN9Qc+zhzB1AQ2/jPq uB+Mt820tU3ej0kO3xAzR6Jlh5Ock5FEQJzTr4qgHH3XAbF62CWwCU1kl+rX9qZdCK KRyQb4F7/4EIox1QVSg29JjiMPaoHc7EZP6E3FVcpGNt87x+gC+xZFMf7aiDQfTNxT OC8AlfckDgukA== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4661801D5 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:04:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Virus: Error (Cannot connect to unix socket '/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl': connect: Connection refused) X-Envelope-From: Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:04:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be; s=mail20171119; t=1750079183; bh=I409hQrn09EMHFiLCaGxv3Oa3G5FBPFoIDOTNfZA/Z0=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; b=DwA/0dnoHMue08hnwo/4stwNdFmMIlY9N/N+wcZa1FxdbcJkGwfp+GR1GeAGbL34X CoZIhBDIzR8tdCCJgLAiYwLNOoUrTorFkEh3+BoPKmaBZVfeGzkifMlVp4J2NufZXQ It2Tg2ErApeIWteoHqnzgimHAZf31hQQPVwGeyhKR3GWfS8mJmaRtXQcXxuQi/b0na SbPOEElOeQRqVO+vIyD3d2p+DsS/Fkv1wjRcINjMZSCJnztp01ZqzVRJekYyoUdIDT coaOwp+PbpJen9mgfXqlPwpS8Tr8yJBhfQQNOhy/tV7HNgyWLMOCNDC3oLo/JCnuOz HTu1bJ0IZRgOQ== Precedence: bulk list-help: list-post: List-Id: internals.lists.php.net x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:06:23 +0200 To: Daniel Kesselberg Cc: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add num_available_processors In-Reply-To: References: <8b76a3d4-4583-4849-a75f-00f645191247@gmail.com> <57f7ed3e-6bef-434d-83db-fd729ff43fc9@gmail.com> <20250527163747.ADA6D1A00BD@lists.php.net> <0FC66A63-1284-41AF-AA27-27F657EB57AF@php.net> <20250527171352.552DD1A00BD@lists.php.net> Message-ID: <70046839e64ba415b7bcfb2e23e03c61@bastelstu.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=) Hi Am 2025-06-15 19:30, schrieb Daniel Kesselberg: > How do we continue? ;) I see there are various ideas how to approach > it, is that something you would vote (let's do a or b) on, or how does > that work? Having secondary votes is generally frowned upon for this kind of simple RFCs. It's mostly used when there are multiple equally-valid choices (which I don't think is the case here). As the RFC author you are expected to be the subject-matter expert and should make a decision that is then voted on, rather than deciding every detail by an individual vote. Best regards Tim Düsterhus