Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:127487
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANTuiHuOxuwB2oTvPNekdkUCJbxWHMMrXjzQfHo2Tsui6NyoXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <c5485d9c-e2de-4bf7-b192-ae6bc50ab58d@sandfox.me> <ea447963-3e7a-4b6b-832e-f967fefa24cb@app.fastmail.com>
 <CANTuiHtWgWKUwGr5cg1T3CkycmJ3zGV9W5zjRREfddwjbzY-Gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <d11495b4-dcd7-484f-8992-01e8f6d395c7@app.fastmail.com> <CANTuiHst8Wjv_meT7arYJ-QZ0FKmT4uj4cTcMfsVr3R2LeUYcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ff33c38b00ee030ccc25d093cd169e34@bastelstu.be>
In-Reply-To: <ff33c38b00ee030ccc25d093cd169e34@bastelstu.be>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 22:58:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CANTuiHvEv9EVNGj9TVFmd-=KC31okU6hkf-3JhjOHof1Bnkvfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Single-Expression functions
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?= <tim@bastelstu.be>
Cc: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>, php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dbad380636237cae"
From: xepozzd@gmail.com (Dmitry Derepko)

--000000000000dbad380636237cae
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Tim for the answer.

Your replies went to the Spam folder. I don't know why.

I'll change the template as you suggested as soon as possible.

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 1:11=E2=80=AFPM Tim D=C3=BCsterhus <tim@bastelstu.b=
e> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Am 2025-05-27 09:08, schrieb Dmitry Derepko:
> > As Tim said, it needs at least a 2 week discussion period.
> >
> >
> > Could you share the reference?
>
> I already did in my email: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto (=E2=80=9CWhen
> discussion ends, and a minimum period of two weeks has passed=E2=80=9D).
>
> > Here it is. I've added the link to the RFC.
> >
>
> It took me a while to find the link in the =E2=80=9CReferences=E2=80=9D s=
ection, because
> that's not where I expected it based on other RFCs. Overall the RFC
> diverges from the RFC template quite a bit. As an example, the =E2=80=9CR=
FC
> Impact=E2=80=9D section is entirely missing. The =E2=80=9CVoting Choices=
=E2=80=9D section is as
> well. The =E2=80=9CMetadata=E2=80=9D section at the top is formatted diff=
erently for no
> reason (and still indicates that the RFC is a Draft). As far as I can
> tell it's also not listed in the RFC overview at
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc either.
>
> As a first-time RFC author, I would recommend you strictly following the
> template and the =E2=80=9CRFC How-To=E2=80=9D to make sure that the RFC i=
s complete and
> follows proper process.
>
> Best regards
> Tim D=C3=BCsterhus
>


--=20
Dmitriy Derepko

--000000000000dbad380636237cae
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Thanks Tim for the answer.<div><br></div>=
<div>Your replies went to the Spam folder. I don&#39;t know why.=C2=A0</div=
><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ll change the template as you suggested as soon =
as possible.=C2=A0</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_con=
tainer"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 1:11=
=E2=80=AFPM Tim D=C3=BCsterhus &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:tim@bastelstu.be">tim@=
bastelstu.be</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex">Hi<br>
<br>
Am 2025-05-27 09:08, schrieb Dmitry Derepko:<br>
&gt; As Tim said, it needs at least a 2 week discussion period.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Could you share the reference?<br>
<br>
I already did in my email: <a href=3D"https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto" rel=
=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto</a> (=E2=
=80=9CWhen <br>
discussion ends, and a minimum period of two weeks has passed=E2=80=9D).<br=
>
<br>
&gt; Here it is. I&#39;ve added the link to the RFC.<br>
&gt; <br>
<br>
It took me a while to find the link in the =E2=80=9CReferences=E2=80=9D sec=
tion, because <br>
that&#39;s not where I expected it based on other RFCs. Overall the RFC <br=
>
diverges from the RFC template quite a bit. As an example, the =E2=80=9CRFC=
 <br>
Impact=E2=80=9D section is entirely missing. The =E2=80=9CVoting Choices=E2=
=80=9D section is as <br>
well. The =E2=80=9CMetadata=E2=80=9D section at the top is formatted differ=
ently for no <br>
reason (and still indicates that the RFC is a Draft). As far as I can <br>
tell it&#39;s also not listed in the RFC overview at <br>
<a href=3D"https://wiki.php.net/rfc" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">h=
ttps://wiki.php.net/rfc</a> either.<br>
<br>
As a first-time RFC author, I would recommend you strictly following the <b=
r>
template and the =E2=80=9CRFC How-To=E2=80=9D to make sure that the RFC is =
complete and <br>
follows proper process.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
Tim D=C3=BCsterhus<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br clear=3D"all"></div><div><br></div><span class=
=3D"gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_s=
ignature"><div dir=3D"ltr">Dmitriy Derepko</div></div></div>

--000000000000dbad380636237cae--