Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:127479
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 12:11:25 +0200
To: Dmitry Derepko <xepozzd@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>, php internals
 <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Single-Expression functions
In-Reply-To: <CANTuiHst8Wjv_meT7arYJ-QZ0FKmT4uj4cTcMfsVr3R2LeUYcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANTuiHuOxuwB2oTvPNekdkUCJbxWHMMrXjzQfHo2Tsui6NyoXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <c5485d9c-e2de-4bf7-b192-ae6bc50ab58d@sandfox.me>
 <ea447963-3e7a-4b6b-832e-f967fefa24cb@app.fastmail.com>
 <CANTuiHtWgWKUwGr5cg1T3CkycmJ3zGV9W5zjRREfddwjbzY-Gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <d11495b4-dcd7-484f-8992-01e8f6d395c7@app.fastmail.com>
 <CANTuiHst8Wjv_meT7arYJ-QZ0FKmT4uj4cTcMfsVr3R2LeUYcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ff33c38b00ee030ccc25d093cd169e34@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2025-05-27 09:08, schrieb Dmitry Derepko:
> As Tim said, it needs at least a 2 week discussion period.
> 
> 
> Could you share the reference?

I already did in my email: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto (“When 
discussion ends, and a minimum period of two weeks has passed”).

> Here it is. I've added the link to the RFC.
> 

It took me a while to find the link in the “References” section, because 
that's not where I expected it based on other RFCs. Overall the RFC 
diverges from the RFC template quite a bit. As an example, the “RFC 
Impact” section is entirely missing. The “Voting Choices” section is as 
well. The “Metadata” section at the top is formatted differently for no 
reason (and still indicates that the RFC is a Draft). As far as I can 
tell it's also not listed in the RFC overview at 
https://wiki.php.net/rfc either.

As a first-time RFC author, I would recommend you strictly following the 
template and the “RFC How-To” to make sure that the RFC is complete and 
follows proper process.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus