Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:127000
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:27:49 +0200
To: Juris Evertovskis <juris@glaive.pro>
Cc: 'php internals' <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Usable classes?
In-Reply-To: <059201dba2ee$35c7bc00$a1573400$@glaive.pro>
References: <059201dba2ee$35c7bc00$a1573400$@glaive.pro>
Message-ID: <f6eeee8ab562c6f60e426794a51154b1@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2025-04-01 12:09, schrieb Juris Evertovskis:
> Sorry, but I've got another idea. I already validated it with ChatGPT 
> who
> labeled it spicy. After clarifying some misunderstandings, they updated 
> the
> label to "heretical". I hope you'll find it exciting as well.
> 
> […]
> 
> As ChatGPT told me yesterday: Sure, this blurs the lines between 
> classes,
> traits, and interfaces. But so does PHP in general.

The wording “spicy”, “heretical”, “literally unusable”, “vibe”, the use 
of ChatGPT, and the current calendar date requires me to ask:

Is this intended as a serious proposal? I've stopped reading halfway 
through, because depending on how the proposal is intended to be 
perceived, the appropriate response and the amount of reasonable time to 
spend on it would differ.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus