Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:126888
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:07:09 +0100
To: Daniel Scherzer <daniel.e.scherzer@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Constructor property promotion for final properties
In-Reply-To: <CALaXqqSa4VhAMWjTdmFvOgRJQt_AZEa+m=n+p0v7RfsXj+0FaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaXqqQdpEg-+FHMkkpvWaMmoqDuHhVri+mU7W=q1KuCQO80-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALaXqqSa4VhAMWjTdmFvOgRJQt_AZEa+m=n+p0v7RfsXj+0FaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <250fd68437fe3025e3aad9eff271dde3@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2025-03-20 21:12, schrieb Daniel Scherzer:
>> I recently found out that constructor property promotion cannot be 
>> used
>> for final properties. I propose that it become allowed. Thoughts? 
>> Would
>> this need an RFC, or is this minor enough to be acceptable with just a
>> mailing list discussion?
>> 
> 
> Given the lack of engagement, I want to make it clear: unless somebody
> objects, maintainers have agreed to merge a PR implementing the feature 
> in
> 2 weeks.
> 
> If you object, please speak up.

Can you clarify if the following would result in constructor property 
promotion or not:

     class Foo {
         public function __construct(
             final string $bar,
         ) { }
     }

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus