Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:126879
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaXqqQdpEg-+FHMkkpvWaMmoqDuHhVri+mU7W=q1KuCQO80-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaXqqQdpEg-+FHMkkpvWaMmoqDuHhVri+mU7W=q1KuCQO80-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:12:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CALaXqqSa4VhAMWjTdmFvOgRJQt_AZEa+m=n+p0v7RfsXj+0FaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Constructor property promotion for final properties
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e6c2f0630cbc435"
From: daniel.e.scherzer@gmail.com (Daniel Scherzer)

--0000000000005e6c2f0630cbc435
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:09=E2=80=AFPM Daniel Scherzer <
daniel.e.scherzer@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi internals,
>
> I recently found out that constructor property promotion cannot be used
> for final properties. I propose that it become allowed. Thoughts? Would
> this need an RFC, or is this minor enough to be acceptable with just a
> mailing list discussion?
>

Given the lack of engagement, I want to make it clear: unless somebody
objects, maintainers have agreed to merge a PR implementing the feature in
2 weeks.

If you object, please speak up.

--Daniel

--0000000000005e6c2f0630cbc435
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:09=E2=80=AFPM =
Daniel Scherzer &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:daniel.e.scherzer@gmail.com">daniel.e=
.scherzer@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quo=
te_container"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px=
 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D=
"ltr">Hi internals,<div><br></div><div>I recently found out that constructo=
r property promotion cannot be used for final properties. I propose that it=
 become allowed. Thoughts? Would this need an RFC, or is this minor enough =
to be acceptable with just=C2=A0a mailing list discussion?</div></div></blo=
ckquote><div><br></div><div>Given the lack of engagement, I want to make it=
 clear: unless somebody objects, maintainers have agreed to merge a PR impl=
ementing the feature in 2 weeks.</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote=
_container"><br></div>If you object, please speak up.</div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_quote gmail_quote_container"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_=
quote_container">--Daniel<br><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div>

--0000000000005e6c2f0630cbc435--