Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:126334
X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5])
	by qa.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1B11A00BC
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  7 Feb 2025 15:11:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail;
	t=1738940897; bh=ctfpDHXUTeeJuks+bzu/OsfyLlr6kWwRsDZDs4+QpNI=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=CJwlksba8NV6OHXusbpW2awZ/ZOI1nuAB7XG/bEQ7891v5AHgJpUmFOcPYyzBjuuV
	 x+60mTD4DM7jRrgOcQbK1laRWn2GoMox7XgBhvNlITDXl6eNeKIbMr/US/+L/sjxTm
	 KJ1hMv39Q/J/Es95VvVTN7Bd1wj2yhrewsR16TIL/N4FWWyKqQIPP6U3+MHIWIII6a
	 0BCrFM3H5IO/osGEU8Ro8xS2hxAEjUTGX8oA1PbRv/uPM+eYp+nvZ5xDLWBiAPYTfR
	 CV/oy9w/aUGsAZULzN0CFcCzqassIFqotl8Sk1i6YwI4O9Pjhpga5/4i2QJ+HNM688
	 Vi04/5zyHXXLw==
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FBB180615
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  7 Feb 2025 15:08:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <tim@bastelstu.be>
Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  7 Feb 2025 15:08:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be;
	s=mail20171119; t=1738941060;
	bh=+jQBGM2O3EfO/Cuo6gQzUleoUdZhnAzvea+Ib8ifexA=;
	h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Message-ID:Content-Type:from:to:cc:subject:message-id;
	b=OD4ASatWXJ4Ad3ASzbbf18Jj8JCfGRv5QSmEXtzSDcDayc2Sph0REtd2oPXAQonIo
	 sYekxEwu1kpJ9Ha6SaCQO48EIqj8u4xhlB0rGDJrKGCWYQ7SkaTbm+cIsBWcRE+l2o
	 TT195SW6Skn54PBEBSYhcVXQxxKB50KyLAGbNKl4CUtyhSSG0r4XWbTq+AezCCZTQ7
	 2pyttd6wTII4Qoxsj5CBmKmtIx4B1V8WeNps7J70Oq8vhsOZAjCFbEwjJycW3ixnuu
	 X8AtNwj+WvzXwOtEOAB48TSLtaf4eTCw+Hu72H4KRXytlyAiLd19hK01Rb0VGtqkVn
	 Z8AV1uLoNiaJg==
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:internals+help@lists.php.net
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:internals+unsubscribe@lists.php.net>
list-post: <mailto:internals@lists.php.net>
List-Id: internals.lists.php.net
x-ms-reactions: disallow
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:11:00 +0100
To: Marc Bennewitz <marc@mabe.berlin>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Enum + property hook getter
In-Reply-To: <5c63909f-f25c-4bb8-b14d-bea420428a78@mabe.berlin>
References: <5c63909f-f25c-4bb8-b14d-bea420428a78@mabe.berlin>
Message-ID: <04144e8065a14f433f228776861edd0c@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2025-02-07 16:03, schrieb Marc Bennewitz:
> Is that something feasible and how complicated would that be to 
> implement?

Supporting this might cause conflicts when full-blown tagged-unions are 
proposed, because those would actually support properties and semantics 
might need to be different than those a naive “rushed” implementation of 
property hooks for enums would propose.

See https://wiki.php.net/rfc/tagged_unions for an very early draft 
(which is not in a shape to be discussed further).

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus