Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:126267 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by qa.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73EF21A00BC for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2025 13:26:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1738502624; bh=UDFspw5C/JJxLQhwiG4pTZQodIyU9LBlDUKIDVgbCqs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oDES+uk+zzndGy4NQ7HhhClMdEAklN7rTO6gUN8RVnu6ZmJFckIM4z7GAHIPhIABX xSU5rWuLLGrbUAt05lt7M4dMQp7e71MMYgVlaz3oXYjs+3eiZxh/uxvnmI+eK3sYYv iySj6ErjWAHzG8vynv8YE0Zs6o5ar51hw5uYybRCThST3pGFLgShvz1BVKDOAacGLq p85xrw/b12P5YkjbbXuEJS1RJeOMc0Z3KQka/Oho3XvfZSSBgaGfX5D0cF4aYo0cZm qEPou3Qww6crqbOL/mPPLG+VDQEHefNaw6CnHp0yzH2vlnXI56aDVnbNjDjZdfrGLz 8nxRwMzep44iw== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2136180034 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2025 13:23:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2025 13:23:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be; s=mail20171119; t=1738502788; bh=BTb7+ozXMnzWarNDy6IqAXR/94xNdE++k25pUHl5cNU=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; b=DJ5+E94EOR/zpLTWQYa1J1/PwWaC6aU3qql7wx3b8Ts6zY0Xfjd1OqpYuD4N8X865 2lsHveIS5tYYEWuQ3XTqRpsmflo5wu/XKNbI2wNbZ4NUEWfXCb6IzX8LTfnaTbIO9f I5O0ZhCGuFxvJEnoOZdDNpjuK5ukkIipyfZdgk+jyZSn4CNfM8Yy9Xf5IWy8Wssg+r K2ciTkSre7+vIeoegV3j3ALvx/Sr4LqsYyTZOLLLbkYahwao2tTeSK5p3UyWI5ZX8e D+ZDOWlC18rHGDDX0ceOGWYeKjV+SAIgJXHArDpRorxVA5n18oGZyTCvgV7WIW33yI jSP3OdogzkuRw== Precedence: bulk list-help: list-post: List-Id: internals.lists.php.net x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 14:26:28 +0100 To: Dmitry Derepko Cc: Ilija Tovilo , PHP internals Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC Karma Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52292fccc4ed3bf888dd38bfceff8044@bastelstu.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=) Hi Dmitry Please do not "top-post" on this list. Put your reply *below* the message you are quoting and ideally cut the quoted parts to the minimum. See below like I do: Am 2025-02-02 10:28, schrieb Dmitry Derepko: > If so, one common RFC or each for each operator: return, break, > continue? `break` and `continue` should be bundled together, because they are so similar. I'd say that a single RFC (and thus a single discussion for all of them) is fine and that RFC can then contain two primary 2/3 majority votes for "Should return statements become expressions?" and "Should break and continue statements become expressions?". Best regards Tim Düsterhus