Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:126256 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by qa.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01D61A00BC for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:03:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1738321254; bh=AclnY1qOmmvXAKjeIWbTwxJ7PolsLAijODhmfPq+Ekw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HshSKcwyB0cwYnP87FEWcvw6QSW3sMh9m+J+IeoGCHAedN3HMsplJNn91FeBnrcZC BAx/+2z4hUiNLb1Yb5BoDVfQdiBJZuLN92o4KqDKYqJ98tUitnkw+2SqmiRQv6MvRC Y4mTkWxEzmp10jENdiiUlrjwa1XI9wl3LQN1JOIcXw5rtw0qkxCDYqCqVjcuNWFx8r 60+od6smsFLms3wKRCFM7oUkdMQN8N0rbDqCM89HOs+r96AX4OEq3RpfoUCic13Ug6 nehstZc33dQ5Ix/9EriJ7X+bWxsr9UIZkc4qMmsLRafbtzf/otLIBK5ywBCJIdmqGR RzXjA0NaE8RDQ== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211B2180078 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:00:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be; s=mail20171119; t=1738321418; bh=w5a95uVj9ogUomqvWDKUI5eUEk+OFDSElQY6BrF0ZVU=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; b=U/vdiAr7+p7T8QgrUBfoyv/mRSAvTWJuE5soMj2HEBawbnRwyFCcq1BelfgO16HgQ jw5HDBSUj8dw6P3ja+kQTKbqAV6zJs04rcCu0dtBX4FBlXeozptieJvSrKK08IrTA4 oxrtW71FXEkRBXBIz4Wiy4P0VjnMKFS8sPi9tqRXexQOrO0Uw0z8txKN3FKqJl34KY lxwux9vJiUVqj0YSjNeiiAeMPZKoSRAvyVlhesFJQ10YMUNfjL8cdJypk2qjNJ1vc5 AAS14aP8v65bveAA1XLl4eaL4YkNncIZtSeaTlUpVJpmsde5i3z5aj1nrZa06JOEza XpAsBV1ZxqYdw== Precedence: bulk list-help: list-post: List-Id: internals.lists.php.net x-ms-reactions: disallow MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:03:38 +0100 To: php internals Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: First Class Callables in constant expressions In-Reply-To: References: <2eba1ea4cffa751e6a5f325b972e86b5@bastelstu.be> Message-ID: <1c7c7c0075b37a8909faa5cf352d57a4@bastelstu.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=) Hi Am 2025-01-31 00:58, schrieb Larry Garfield: > I don't know how to interpret the radio silence from the list, but this > seems like an obvious and good follow-on to the previous RFC and has my > support. We also interpreted the lack of responses as “this is an obvious follow-up and I don't have any questions or concerns”, especially since FCC support also came up in the discussion of the Closure RFC and was split into a separate RFC primarily to give each of these features the proper attention with regard to implementation and edge cases. In hindsight this was the correct decision, since the implementation for FCC was much more complicated and edge-casey than initially expected, whereas Closures were reasonably straight forward. Best regards Tim Düsterhus