Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:125686
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:13:45 +0200
To: Jim Winstead <jimw@trainedmonkey.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Using and Mentioning Third-party
 Packages in PHP Documentation and Web Projects
In-Reply-To: <cdd6db55-37cd-4c19-97d5-e6cfca8c812b@app.fastmail.com>
References: <642cb3ea-bf51-4832-8539-0540742000e1@app.fastmail.com>
 <cdd6db55-37cd-4c19-97d5-e6cfca8c812b@app.fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <477c134b8fbb2254de2151b747274064@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?=)

Hi

Am 2024-09-25 01:45, schrieb Jim Winstead:
> It has taken me longer than initially anticipated to circle back to 
> this, but I intend to open the voting on this RFC on Thursday 
> (2024-09-26T16:00:00Z or so) unless there are any other changes that 
> anyone would like to propose.
> 
> The RFC again: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/web-and-doc-use-not-endorsement

Thank you. I've used your reminder as the opportunity to catch up with 
this thread after my vacation.

I'm likely going to vote “no” on your RFC, because I do not believe that 
your proposed statement of principle makes the situation any *less* 
vague. It just makes the situation vague in a different way, because 
there are no guidelines regarding what is acceptable and what is not, as 
also mentioned by others in this RFC's discussion thread.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus