Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:125330
Message-ID: <20e14927-f691-4b74-a49b-1148aaf94d83@scriptfusion.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 22:51:52 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static Constructor
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAGS0MVC9q+byG_Gogt+kb84TSVKG-FV+5xM=vMTZWQ+nyi4g_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABdc3WpMOOzQ7oHhJHsO6wvi=tJYdYn7sPqP-WSiruhhkjWH2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGS0MVAauNxCN1GtLz9KUP5-9A-G6Mt=RAqtFsB=jme64UzUkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <672fc21c-5fed-4cbe-9642-bc8e56f4955f@bastelstu.be>
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <672fc21c-5fed-4cbe-9642-bc8e56f4955f@bastelstu.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: bilge@scriptfusion.com (Bilge)

On 19/06/2024 19:25, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 6/19/24 16:03, Erick de Azevedo Lima wrote:
>> I have considered some names, actually. I just chose this one for the
>> implementation because
>> I tried to design it to be as close as possible to the C# implementation
>> and they call it "static constructor".
>> But the name can be changed to another one without any problem at all.
>
> I would suggest `__constructStatic()`. This matches the existing 
> naming pattern of `__callStatic()` being the companion to `__call()`.
>
> Best regards
> Tim Düsterhus

Why can't it just be `public static function __construct()`?

Cheers,
Bilge