Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:125246
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------UNKl5SKjWNrWN4XlBhhU48Uk"
Message-ID: <792a811e-edf8-4a82-8422-e11cc302a6db@scriptfusion.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:42:20 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Default expression
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <0c8ed5d6-5507-4c41-8d7f-05d14ba8aa4c@scriptfusion.com>
 <0cfd3a28-3cb0-4478-85fb-cf086d8e5c66@app.fastmail.com>
 <3e0d031e-256f-47cd-9a2b-dcdc760f5498@scriptfusion.com>
 <e2cd7203-8a25-494d-9c9d-b8abad02c8e8@rwec.co.uk>
 <6afeb23a-867f-457d-9b13-fdf5af02c31e@scriptfusion.com>
 <F374AE89-A6E4-4C40-9C33-6569D47589ED@rwec.co.uk>
 <928d6c8c-c969-4d55-82ff-5da8fc3d3035@scriptfusion.com>
 <B94573C6-6AA9-4A9A-8E28-D9B158EB7344@rwec.co.uk>
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <B94573C6-6AA9-4A9A-8E28-D9B158EB7344@rwec.co.uk>
From: bilge@scriptfusion.com (Bilge)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------UNKl5SKjWNrWN4XlBhhU48Uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 25/08/2024 23:31, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
> It doesn't, unfortunately, persuade me that the behaviour proposed is sensible.

It should. But since it has apparently failed in that regard, I suggest 
you take me up on my challenge to implement the grammar you want with a 
patch and you will quickly convince yourself one way or the other. The 
truth doesn't exist in my head or yours, nor on this mailing list. The 
truth always lies in the code, which is why RFC authors are strongly 
encouraged to pursue patches where there is doubt, and similarly, I 
think counter-proposals on the mailing list should follow suit, 
otherwise we can find ourselves arguing over nothing.

Kind regards, Bilge

--------------UNKl5SKjWNrWN4XlBhhU48Uk
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/08/2024 23:31, Rowan Tommins
      [IMSoP] wrote:<span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span><span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span></div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:B94573C6-6AA9-4A9A-8E28-D9B158EB7344@rwec.co.uk">
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">It doesn't, unfortunately, persuade me that the behaviour proposed is sensible.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p>It should. But since it has apparently failed in that regard, I
      suggest you take me up on my challenge to implement the grammar
      you want with a patch and you will quickly convince yourself one
      way or the other. The truth doesn't exist in my head or yours, nor
      on this mailing list. The truth always lies in the code, which is
      why RFC authors are strongly encouraged to pursue patches where
      there is doubt, and similarly, I think counter-proposals on the
      mailing list should follow suit, otherwise we can find ourselves
      arguing over nothing.<span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span></p>
    <p><span style="white-space: pre-wrap">Kind regards,
Bilge
</span></p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------UNKl5SKjWNrWN4XlBhhU48Uk--