Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124840
Message-ID: <b5c029390dcfc23e8ed56f3e1b3cd8d1fd411f17.camel@ageofdream.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Static class
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:32:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5a6c8431-011a-49cb-8f33-93f48e018eaf@scriptfusion.com>
References: <975490b1-8232-4f27-b850-212f6da64b3a@scriptfusion.com>
	 <5a6c8431-011a-49cb-8f33-93f48e018eaf@scriptfusion.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: lists@ageofdream.com (Nick Lockheart)


> Voting has now concluded for static class. The first vote cast was
> for, and of the first four votes cast, three were for and one was
> against. As the votes continued to roll in, however, it was clear
> which direction the wind was blowing. The final tally reached the the
> 2/3 critical mass required... in the negative. With 20 votes against
> and only 11 for, with one final vote being cast for in the final few
> days, it would not come close to saving this one. With such a blowout
> defeat, I consider this proposal dismissed with prejudice, meaning
> we'll never speak of it again.

I like the idea of static classes.