Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124744
Message-ID: <332927b9-8caf-4139-9e03-0ab267500745@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 20:02:38 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add Directive to Make All Namespaced Function
 CallsGlobal
Content-Language: de-DE
To: Nick Lockheart <lists@ageofdream.com>, internals@lists.php.net
References: <d9c62789e46d1f3bbb67b9c966bb613661f7889b.camel@ageofdream.com>
In-Reply-To: <d9c62789e46d1f3bbb67b9c966bb613661f7889b.camel@ageofdream.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:RLAptzE7C/Y=;j7m1IutNcHBvHMwBziluv9sbm6U
 lGNXSaowA4sSo+3Okhn1/r5mAwgJZf7zTgTHQvq71d4ZD8vO8q0AzeEiklQhf1RrySiZsSPby
 UUU7lr75vioedy+A7DcH35xbrP7gVmwGdV51t3P1tAM8Qt5JG42TJ4e0rnJieBE7+YmkEgSwq
 NaHpD2O2UVLKSuX8PVZjPM6kWBAmEs7OmFzIRBGk/UP4J5+C0jsqqNU0cwb2ydFx/w5f0LZ0L
 f5MqmSlM5yemSm1ywZIbp0vEkwpG5N88E+Xn/5kGLnxxTScHj2i6R06ooqOk63vkjbKagQmbf
 Gc+G4wxjj8vExfICXHQazLNixffWvlfzGaWLi3Um2YyoPgJroBpVE+ec4KBXc0Xa3nI5Ap98s
 SfaqZ+yQCOje0MxYhY8eV8wcX4GlgpPjzwEsso9banaJpgcdEIsndFuDb6gQcT8w7B/lP5Q/y
 tiPzfrnqTlVwoBbvIVzzvpiVnzAlLMrxfgvPOgGAOMkpv6OTYiWFXUnhRxNzLKPiqf9hSiQIW
 O/T18Rr5nlodY777L4eoWz6RLy1ZJbwHC2wChivm3Tz3ZB2hkuy7TSSLxYDHIbS7MTegwQ+2j
 1i5hYuObOD5JCuo2Pp8O847SS6o1KFKmDLbuCCEzxOCFHh6emKs0DgvqLKMpnWQfIlXvnMeYR
 xD4aRuklurFqXb7IqmMtqyenFs79klk+JGQ9172lrrSB9q5Zwzq58Jj0CgrwY7UpxOIPMBLU6
 qMgsG3RLlhLCFPbeZziF1JCeBp+ipPJeLI4/uOaqfCPUZA7RQFQbfAHHRZAsz2lNr4opQxuBP
 sjJ2AiVMpveMOtB0wv7c+Brg==
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker")

On 04.08.2024 at 15:09, Nick Lockheart wrote:

> To that end, I have created the following RFC:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/global_function_parser_directive
> I am asking that we discuss and vote on the following question:
>
> =E2=80=9CShould there be some way for developers to signal to the parser=
 at
> compile time that all unqualified function names found in a namespace
> context are global, without a namespace lookup?=E2=80=9D
>
> Yes: We should do this, let's discuss syntax possibilities.
>
> No: This should not be a feature at all.

Thanks for the PR!

However, it seems to me that the "syntax possibilites" are an important
part of the vote.  Maybe all will agree that having that option is good,
but there still might not even be consensus on the "syntax".

Maybe just some straw poll to gauge interest in the general feature
would be more appropriate?

Christoph