Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124417
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------iDlqGALTFimEesYKWYYIWL7j"
Message-ID: <904c1dfa-a769-49a6-ace6-ebebe311b920@scriptfusion.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:03:43 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Static class
To: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <eb3f59cc-3ed8-461a-a3a4-f6ba10ed31e1@scriptfusion.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <eb3f59cc-3ed8-461a-a3a4-f6ba10ed31e1@scriptfusion.com>
From: bilge@scriptfusion.com (Bilge)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------iDlqGALTFimEesYKWYYIWL7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 24/06/2024 00:10, Bilge wrote:
> Hi Internals!
>
> I am pleased to present my first RFC: Static class 
> <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_class>.

Gentle reminder that voting is scheduled to start Monday, barring any 
unexpected developments over this weekend.

The RFC is unchanged since including support for `abstract static` last 
week, other than the addition of a /discussion/ section, to capture some 
of the criticisms levied against the proposal, and /in the wild/ section 
to explore the prevalence of implicit static classes in open source that 
might benefit from the proposal.

Cheers,
Bilge

--------------iDlqGALTFimEesYKWYYIWL7j
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/06/2024 00:10, Bilge wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:eb3f59cc-3ed8-461a-a3a4-f6ba10ed31e1@scriptfusion.com">Hi
      Internals!
      <br>
      <br>
      I am pleased to present my first RFC: Static class
      <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_class">&lt;https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_class&gt;</a>.<br>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Gentle reminder that voting is scheduled to start Monday, barring
      any unexpected developments over this weekend.</p>
    <p>The RFC is unchanged since including support for `abstract
      static` last week, other than the addition of a <i>discussion</i>
      section, to capture some of the criticisms levied against the
      proposal, and <i>in the wild</i> section to explore the
      prevalence of implicit static classes in open source that might
      benefit from the proposal.</p>
    <p>Cheers,<br>
      Bilge<br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------iDlqGALTFimEesYKWYYIWL7j--