Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124350 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by qa.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051081A00BD for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:11:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1720624379; bh=3evrYpK8Z+ihkYjhfk2gPwCosAZoqw8rvNQ2xRX9i5k=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HlQWA1Ni37Ywm0KX7QAEwZk4qrF2Yd5IoDD17C82TF+pmxFCG6zRCaIoBluaDahG0 dkpANz/w8BfvD3Ujfic4/zT6MPGdkPHnJ53OSiWS1945fm1XWz8I2UIqpNXMApI4dF MbDNLWxUcvfJAsdP3aqLsveH5MnvSCtGUUKjCXcVA5oL3slSl/Uj00ANNQcJSdtsfL tcG87XlCXQAol42V0hZHZTUicl84Nb88vUSd9bt/78blJsxd7uQmRaWbx248E7PVXY e2ecA4pk2v6Hh/FjdQipbjHA7vQwfphGsxD7zMCDE8m3IewSc23S1i/obmTS/U73zd gjPWf6f2rc2wA== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60DB18092E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:12:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch (mail-4018.proton.ch [185.70.40.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:12:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gpb.moe; s=protonmail2; t=1720624290; x=1720883490; bh=3evrYpK8Z+ihkYjhfk2gPwCosAZoqw8rvNQ2xRX9i5k=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=IiFFn9CA0mM0juUQbg5/O++Ryx16MZRP0/EjfFviTQzDXqn+UJrnCj4nTGJyNLtaI EiKzZHAzZ+Hgk4CigYrrLoIlLcl3ZtNiB2/HY7kf2NVYAhxIkFZ1oUjxgrx3rX/osY /xPnlUtRfijYmtLU8b6U3RRefyrl3aEZMvEf1zdjUKN37owW0iI5+l3HX28zd3dc/r BaRapLRdAsq77J6EFqWBlKEverNfsUYPIXMPsG/iisRLwe3oMvie9f6z1ZgLWk/Qn8 HJddcPQrP+kNBWg41hey2pNdrJrZlfnGhOV/8NPVW102Qn5RDAT9Gf7vllTvq/1umH BmjIJUk5DClEQ== Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:11:25 +0000 To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Documentation List , PHP Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Negatively Voted Notes Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Feedback-ID: 96993444:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: fc1f7bd18f94bbea0f499e870ebaeb6a7d77c4cb Precedence: bulk list-help: list-post: List-Id: internals.lists.php.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internals@gpb.moe ("Gina P. Banyard") On Wednesday, 10 July 2024 at 15:18, Derick Rethans wrote: > Hi! >=20 > There are currently nearly 20000 notes in the documentation, with many > having a very high negative rating. >=20 > For example, there are: >=20 > 1131 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -10 > 2339 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -5 > 5761 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -1 >=20 > The worst offender is: >=20 > https://www.php.net/manual/en/features.cookies.php#128286 with -159 (not = sure why the website says -153) > https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.attributes.overview.php#126887 wit= h -104 >=20 > We discussed this during one of our foundation meetings, and we propose: >=20 > - to delete all notes with a rating less than -5 that are older than a > year. > - come up with a plan to crowd source going through the other thousands > of notes to see if they need to be deleted or integrated into the > actual text. Each documentation page now has a link to the XML source > (such as https://github.com/php/doc-en/blob/master/language/attributes.xm= l) >=20 > Comments? As one of the primary persons that tries to triage new notes, I am strongly= in favour. Unrelated, it would be very nice if we could improve the spam filters for u= ser notes somewhat, but this is unrelated to removing unpopular votes. One question, should this possibly become a monthly cron job that checks fo= r the user notes and removes those that fall below the above criterias? Best regards, Gina P. Banyard