Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124279
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------Z0UzVIfEixHPrz5CiIA96h7V"
Message-ID: <743774dd-2281-458d-b0fa-d3e8806a3516@scriptfusion.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 08:42:19 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class
To: Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <eb3f59cc-3ed8-461a-a3a4-f6ba10ed31e1@scriptfusion.com>
 <f3e738cd-dd9b-490e-a1f1-a1227cb696d2@scriptfusion.com>
 <D76AE2E1-E75F-41DF-844E-963613F4EC0D@newclarity.net>
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <D76AE2E1-E75F-41DF-844E-963613F4EC0D@newclarity.net>
From: bilge@scriptfusion.com (Bilge)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------Z0UzVIfEixHPrz5CiIA96h7V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 08/07/2024 01:16, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
>     Congrats on getting it to this point.
>
Thanks. It's been an adventure :^)

>     I support this in all but the RFC's restriction on `abstract`, as
>     I have previously mentioned on the list.
>
I must have missed a key point here. Let's suppose we're writing a 
follow-up RFC to permit `static` and `abstract` together. In as few 
sentences as possible, what is the benefit conferred to the developer?

Cheers,
Bilge

--------------Z0UzVIfEixHPrz5CiIA96h7V
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/07/2024 01:16, Mike Schinkel
      wrote:</div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:D76AE2E1-E75F-41DF-844E-963613F4EC0D@newclarity.net">
      <blockquote
        style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class="">
        <div>
          <div>Congrats on getting it to this point.</div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    Thanks. It's been an adventure :^)<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:D76AE2E1-E75F-41DF-844E-963613F4EC0D@newclarity.net">
      <blockquote
        style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class="">
        <div>I support this in all but the RFC's restriction on
          `abstract`, as I have previously mentioned on the list.</div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I must have missed a key point here. Let's suppose we're writing
      a follow-up RFC to permit `static` and `abstract` together. In as
      few sentences as possible, what is the benefit conferred to the
      developer?</p>
    <p>Cheers,<br>
      Bilge<br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------Z0UzVIfEixHPrz5CiIA96h7V--