Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124244 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by qa.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 886FE1A009C for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 09:55:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1720259803; bh=iy2Tv5vCPcdFW6QRuP8KLWXp4p50G9yQV8wWgu4A0BM=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=n7KYO10kwT3sW6k09XdwG5Boj5apBMuFxqnvCgxmRoljOpJGpDPo2RX+EWP5cMCn0 IKV+w/LNHdW+oSbiJidSaPVcWUOMPLB78qnc8pTGhhaDysMJZ5ey8U24FE0BOK2AL8 0X+h28RuxDUjzcig8zQMU5xgcXzOU4qWpYHp/K4P8dzmfT7+Ms4GjxPdPV8K1WL3C+ G11eNdQnYguxw/l0J7eHNgsvvqN1leOCDcitTf5S5bsO2VdNGRemyRLYHxtq0E8r7N t3YTlyRvRrrpD8hQ8DpOR7IWnkhJRU6/bFsTDMrAMK3DrvJbOj23WnUPSelSh++ODk fouLbYgbIExmw== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A9918005F for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 09:56:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: Error (Cannot connect to unix socket '/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl': connect: Connection refused) X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail.sakiot.com (mail.sakiot.com [160.16.227.216]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 09:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpclient.apple (100.71.239.49.rev.vmobile.jp [49.239.71.100]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sakiot.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEA67401ED; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:55:14 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sakiot.com; s=default; t=1720259714; bh=iy2Tv5vCPcdFW6QRuP8KLWXp4p50G9yQV8wWgu4A0BM=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=Cos7FbS5bUL5n7n2XmKUTLQBx6N8vmBWbDJ8g1JmV5cv0x2om2RP3E1o1Bgi88IX4 yv77jC5MilvJ9lJxrM2J3zuKmJM4wkUf6RuDMyfKK4L4tMeJE6ScsVPME5sVEDLm+f kwuaLiZ+NQzywo09fuSQ7BPvsrFf7QnOTboQou/w= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk list-help: list-post: List-Id: internals.lists.php.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:55:02 +0900 Message-ID: <462AD8D8-C32B-4C62-8A5D-99396CDE31FA@sakiot.com> References: Cc: shinji igarashi , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: To: chopins xiao X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90) From: saki@sakiot.com (Saki Takamachi) =EF=BB=BFHi, >> =EF=BB=BFThe reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, t= he Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI rec= ommendations is unfounded, and secondly, the PR commit(https://github.com/ph= p/php-src/commit/4acf0084dcd63ec369a610ec966db33f322694c8) has not been vote= d on by the RFC, and the implementation is very simple and crude, and does n= ot solve the problem that FFI's API is not so elegant =EF=BC=88At the very l= east, there are shortcomings such as complicated API calls, mixed use of mul= tiple types of functions, and reduced performance=EF=BC=89. >> There are so many masters,I don't understand why it was merged. The commi= t implementation was not voted on, and it is possible to withdraw it first. >=20 > If I'm not misunderstanding something, they were voted on. >=20 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_functions_with_overloaded_signatures >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Saki I may have misunderstood what you were saying. I'm starting to get a little confused. What exactly do you mean by voting on a commit? Regards, Saki=