Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124243 X-Original-To: internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: internals@lists.php.net Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (php-smtp4.php.net [45.112.84.5]) by qa.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEF121A009C for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:21:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1720254173; bh=/V3tbqH0VFnmF3fTeceIhZa1qPNDbMwDtNGYNJ3MfLY=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=UXqo6+lQ6p6CRvpoMMjc8pC3Jzvj7zwL9XM/1wWRxuovPKkdhRyTEMdT8Hd034RLk 7/EvTjMuBFpCnsoDzWCX7rw++WgHdwE5nsdUxChlzHE1Y99aPAM86+pvnOig2ddao4 yKBQ+bbW3whEd9qdAs+s4kAjE/QPTKLmgKmUvfysOTi7sY25oSm9vMgI6J1FlbLo8x 7dN0h15kFYNhSq/pk4KWaga4yzF/pjj0iH6BtGZKKumXUmrg/aJoHs2SBD2CazWRZj lKyVDeErgMF/DuPASHydYdr2l4loh6TVPo42he8kiAKA/zgT2sqycF2bdUb9G8w429 Lrxu4iZjGF2dw== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548D41806E0 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:22:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: Error (Cannot connect to unix socket '/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl': connect: Connection refused) X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail.sakiot.com (mail.sakiot.com [160.16.227.216]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpclient.apple (239.71.239.49.rev.vmobile.jp [49.239.71.239]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sakiot.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D16DB401ED; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 17:21:23 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sakiot.com; s=default; t=1720254083; bh=/V3tbqH0VFnmF3fTeceIhZa1qPNDbMwDtNGYNJ3MfLY=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=eO/5nnFJzSxmA8qC3skWVrndfoifs+951duUtB7F8uZx1szW1qahc4G5yUi56S3N3 hiC+2C0K8Nn6kVqr7y37Uhr3kXOJaiDuY2GXvOZ6MEcPLyoTXOygsRP/5L8y27JjOy JdUTOcHIhZk4KkdV4/miZN8vDoGQ7N5yH5mXdEjE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk list-help: list-post: List-Id: internals.lists.php.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 17:21:10 +0900 Message-ID: References: Cc: shinji igarashi , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: To: chopins xiao X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90) From: saki@sakiot.com (Saki Takamachi) Hi, > =EF=BB=BFThe reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, th= e Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI reco= mmendations is unfounded, and secondly, the PR commit(https://github.com/php= /php-src/commit/4acf0084dcd63ec369a610ec966db33f322694c8) has not been voted= on by the RFC, and the implementation is very simple and crude, and does no= t solve the problem that FFI's API is not so elegant =EF=BC=88At the very le= ast, there are shortcomings such as complicated API calls, mixed use of mult= iple types of functions, and reduced performance=EF=BC=89. > There are so many masters,I don't understand why it was merged. The commit= implementation was not voted on, and it is possible to withdraw it first. If I'm not misunderstanding something, they were voted on. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_functions_with_overloaded_signatures Regards, Saki=