Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:124055
Feedback-ID: ifab94697:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-538-g1508afaa2-fm-20240616.001-g1508afaa
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9ce8144c-e3cd-44d1-9d1c-5ff4a7630171@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5BC325F-C00C-4856-8A9E-63A2BFC91668@benramsey.com>
References: <5371DD3F-8CDF-43B8-BC1D-2EBD8B604766@benramsey.com>
 <EF7A2EA2-3F31-4548-A4DA-907FFCF8F9C1@sakiot.com>
 <F5BC325F-C00C-4856-8A9E-63A2BFC91668@benramsey.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:52:24 +0200
To: "Ben Ramsey" <ben@benramsey.com>, "Saki Takamachi" <saki@sakiot.com>
Cc: "Barney Laurance" <barney@barneylaurance.uk>, internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Make the GMP class final
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary=93e8f4ae3efe4403ab21722fee2b17e6
From: rob@bottled.codes ("Rob Landers")

--93e8f4ae3efe4403ab21722fee2b17e6
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, at 19:31, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 2024, at 12:25, Saki Takamachi <saki@sakiot.com> wrote:
> >=20
> > Hi,
> >=20
> >> Sure, it=E2=80=99s allowed to change its mind, but if we bring this=
 for a vote in two weeks, and then we vote a week later for the other (o=
r even at the same time), I would see the results of those votes as conf=
licting viewpoints and not as the community changing its mind within the=
 span of a few weeks.
> >=20
> > I am pretty sure there is no chance that another RFC will start voti=
ng at the same time as this one (unless they ignore the discussion and s=
tart it forcefully).
> >=20
> > And even if they were to force a vote, it would have almost no chanc=
e of passing.
> >=20
> > Regards,
> >=20
> > Saki
>=20
>=20
> Fair enough. I agree that we probably won=E2=80=99t find ourselves in =
this hypothetical conflicting state.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Ben
>=20

I think it is extremely likely they'll be out for a vote at the exact sa=
me time. I literally just finished the implementation and example code. =
I'll probably be opening a PR in the morning (EU time) as well as updati=
ng the RFC with clearer examples, details for implementors, etc.

My RFC includes a vote that this RFC encompasses, so it seems like a pis=
sing match just for the sake of pissing.

=E2=80=94 Rob
--93e8f4ae3efe4403ab21722fee2b17e6
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type=3D"text/css">p.Mso=
Normal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div>On Sat, Jun 29,=
 2024, at 19:31, Ben Ramsey wrote:<br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite" id=
=3D"qt" style=3D""><div>&gt; On Jun 29, 2024, at 12:25, Saki Takamachi &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:saki@sakiot.com">saki@sakiot.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>=
</div><div>&gt;&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt; Hi,<br></div><div>&gt;&nbsp;<br=
></div><div>&gt;&gt; Sure, it=E2=80=99s allowed to change its mind, but =
if we bring this for a vote in two weeks, and then we vote a week later =
for the other (or even at the same time), I would see the results of tho=
se votes as conflicting viewpoints and not as the community changing its=
 mind within the span of a few weeks.<br></div><div>&gt;&nbsp;<br></div>=
<div>&gt; I am pretty sure there is no chance that another RFC will star=
t voting at the same time as this one (unless they ignore the discussion=
 and start it forcefully).<br></div><div>&gt;&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt; A=
nd even if they were to force a vote, it would have almost no chance of =
passing.<br></div><div>&gt;&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt; Regards,<br></div><=
div>&gt;&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt; Saki<br></div><div><br></div><div><br>=
</div><div>Fair enough. I agree that we probably won=E2=80=99t find ours=
elves in this hypothetical conflicting state.<br></div><div><br></div><d=
iv>Cheers,<br></div><div>Ben<br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div><=
br></div><div>I think it is extremely likely they'll be out for a vote a=
t the exact same time. I literally just finished the implementation and =
example code. I'll probably be opening a PR in the morning (EU time) as =
well as updating the RFC with clearer examples, details for implementors=
, etc.<br></div><div><br></div><div>My RFC includes a vote that this RFC=
 encompasses, so it seems like a pissing match just for the sake of piss=
ing.<br></div><div><br></div><div id=3D"sig121229152">=E2=80=94 Rob<br><=
/div></body></html>
--93e8f4ae3efe4403ab21722fee2b17e6--