Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:123929
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:32:37 -0400
To: Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.com>
Cc: Claude Pache <claude.pache@gmail.com>, php internals
 <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <69DA7EA5-472C-4BEC-ADA6-6195C08B1F61@edison.tech>
In-Reply-To: <20070836-3F80-4CCE-A565-32C9720EDCDB@koalephant.com>
References: <eb3f59cc-3ed8-461a-a3a4-f6ba10ed31e1@scriptfusion.com>
 <88D83E92-94BE-4548-B398-8F5C74765FFD@gmail.com>
 <882BD9E0-42E9-4C84-A144-7C1DFC4CE5EB@newclarity.net>
 <DB280533-7FBE-41CD-B841-9BB163A75280@koalephant.com>
 <E7E74C47-DB7C-4C68-929A-B44145D3DBAB@newclarity.net>
 <F7F512B6-1A4B-435F-B438-9A4D41D12DA9@koalephant.com>
 <662F259B-D125-48EA-8AA0-1DC8BECA4C09@newclarity.net>
 <97BA9681-FA0A-4929-A6F4-67DF4820ADBF@koalephant.com>
 <94425545-7066-4D2B-BAA2-65CDE7117E56@newclarity.net>
 <20070836-3F80-4CCE-A565-32C9720EDCDB@koalephant.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="667d1595_6b8b4567_21e3"
From: mike@newclarity.net (Mike Schinkel)

--667d1595_6b8b4567_21e3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

     
 

 
 

 
>  
> On Jun 27, 2024 at 3:26 AM,  <Stephen Reay (mailto:php-lists@koalephant.com)>  wrote:
>  
>  
>  
> I think I understand your view: you're not as concerned with consistency if the alternative is something "better".   
>  
>  
>  
 
 
 
 That yes, but more importantly, that deciding NOT to disallow calling `static` methods on `abstract static` classes is a decision for the ages that cannot be reversed later because of BC.
 
 
 
 And with that, I think we've both beaten this horse to death so I am over and out on this topic.
 
 
 
 -Mike
 
     
--667d1595_6b8b4567_21e3
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<html><body><div id=3D=22edo-message=22><div></div></div><div id=3D=22edo=
-original=22><br><blockquote type=3D=22cite=22 style=3D=22margin:1ex 0 0 =
0; height: min-content; border-left:1px =23ccc solid;padding-left:0.5ex;=22=
><div>On Jun 27, 2024 at 3:26 AM, &lt;<a href=3D=22mailto:php-lists=40koa=
lephant.com=22>Stephen Reay</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div><div><div>I thin=
k I understand your view: you're not as concerned with consistency if the=
 alternative is something =22better=22. &nbsp;</div></div></div></blockqu=
ote><div><span style=3D=22text-align: inherit; -webkit-tap-highlight-colo=
r: transparent; background-color: inherit;=22><br></span></div><div><span=
 style=3D=22text-align: inherit; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: transparent=
; background-color: inherit;=22>That yes, but more importantly, that deci=
ding NOT to disallow calling =60static=60 methods on =60abstract static=60=
 classes is a decision for the ages that cannot be reversed later because=
 of BC.</span><br></div><div><span style=3D=22text-align: inherit; -webki=
t-tap-highlight-color: transparent; background-color: inherit;=22><br></s=
pan></div><div><span style=3D=22text-align: inherit; -webkit-tap-highligh=
t-color: transparent; background-color: inherit;=22>And with that, I thin=
k we've both beaten this horse to death so I am over and out on this topi=
c.</span></div><div><span style=3D=22text-align: inherit; -webkit-tap-hig=
hlight-color: transparent; background-color: inherit;=22><br></span></div=
><div><span style=3D=22text-align: inherit; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: =
transparent; background-color: inherit;=22>-Mike</span></div></div></body=
></html>
--667d1595_6b8b4567_21e3--